World Photography Forum

World Photography Forum (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/index.php)
-   The Photography Forum (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Printer recommendations please? (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/showthread.php?t=2680)

Nogbad 27-08-07 10:31

Printer recommendations please?
 
Hi guys, looking to buy new printer as mine is kaput!

Have a Canon Pixma IP4000 which I was never really been happy with and now it won't print with any thing like the colours it should and despite trying everything it just won't play ball. Canon themselves were pretty useless when asked for information/help, and basically did'nt want to know.

I am thinking of an Epson printer about £150.00ish but want to get the best I can afford. I dont want loads of bells and whistles, just a good reliable printer which will give me good A4 prints.

Iam sure you guys can give me lots of recommendations.

Many thanks in advance.

Nogbad

Saphire 27-08-07 11:06

Nogbad, I have had lots of different epsons over the years and found them to only last about 18 mths. The ones I had r300 and the r800 and earlier ones went into cleaning mode everytime I switched on, I didn't get many photos before the ink ran out and not just the one colour, all colours.
I decided to go for the canon ip6700 because I can still change individual cartridges and its at a good price. The photos are superb and haven't had to put in a new cartridge in 6 months, I am just about to buy my first lot and only the ones that have run out, which is black, magenta and cyan the others are still 3/4 full. Bare in mind I don't print many anyway it is used more for text and the occasional photo.

Leif 27-08-07 11:19

I had an Epson 870 and it was forever blocking, and the cleaning cycles used up huge amounts of expensive ink. In the end about half the ink was wasted. dpreview is a good place for printer information.

yelvertoft 27-08-07 12:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leif (Post 22907)
I had an Epson 870 and it was forever blocking, and the cleaning cycles used up huge amounts of expensive ink. In the end about half the ink was wasted. dpreview is a good place for printer information.

I had an Epson, I think it was the 870 too. My experience of this printer was identical to Leif's. I think you did very well to only wasting 1/2 of the ink on cleaning cycles. This printer put me off the idea of home printing completely.

D.

Canis Vulpes 27-08-07 13:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by yelvertoft (Post 22909)
I had an Epson, I think it was the 870 too. My experience of this printer was identical to Leif's. I think you did very well to only wasting 1/2 of the ink on cleaning cycles. This printer put me off the idea of home printing completely.

D.

Exactly my experience!

I have been looking at a colour laser CLP300 from Samsung. PC World pricing at £119. I only print documents maps etc. I'll be waiting for the next Apple OS before I take the plunge and I advise anyone with a PC to check Vista compatibility/availability of drivers before the part with cash.

I never print photographs at home, I leave it to the professionals at PhotoBox.

Nogbad 27-08-07 14:41

Thanks guys, so it sounds like the Epson printers could be as bad as the Canons?

I have my prints for comps etc printed profesionally, but as my wife makes home made cards from my images thats why we wanted a fairly reliable printer to produce images for these.

Seems I will need to do a bit more searching and try some of the magazine reviews for info.

Thanks to all for your helpful comments.

Cheers

Nogbad

mw_aurora 27-08-07 15:25

Seems that the older Epsons have really tainted your views :)

Having started using Epsons fairly recently (about 4 years) I have nothing but praise for the quality and rarely had to run clean cycles (only if the printer has been off for several weeks, and then not every time). Yes, they drink ink but not much worse than the HP ahem 'photo' printers I used before.

One thing to note - I believe that Epson photo printers use a little of all colours when printing text, therefore they can be very exensive to run if you want to do general printing as well as photos. I have a very cheap HP Deskjet for that purpose and only print photos on my R1800.

I think that if you want to create high quality prints yourself, whichever manufacturer you chose, you are going to end up using a lot of ink.

Nogbad, I was going to recommend the Epson R260 - it uses the latest print-head tech and Claria ink - but I see it isn't availble in the UK - I guess that the R265 is the equivalent? It will not work standalone (i.e. it doesn't have an LCD and you can't just stick a CF card into it and print) but at half the price of the standalone equivalent, you can either buy another set of inks or a cheap deskjet to do general printing on ;)

Stephen, yes, it is easy to use an online lab and cheaper for the odd print, but you don't get that satisfaction of watching your print coming off the printer...

Roy C 27-08-07 16:40

I had trouble with a couple of older Epson's with blocked nozzles but I have had my R800 for almost three years now with no problems - one of the things I do is to leave to printer turned on and do a quick nozzles check print every week or so if I have not used it.
I have now also found a compatible ink which IMO is just about as good as Epson originals but at 1/5 of the price.
Print quality wise I still find the R800 stunning.

Roy C 27-08-07 16:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by mw_aurora (Post 22912)
One thing to note - I believe that Epson photo printers use a little of all colours when printing text.

As I understand it Mark, on my R800 (A4 version of R1800) if you select Grayscale it only uses Matte black ink.

mw_aurora 27-08-07 17:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy C (Post 22915)
As I understand it Mark, on my R800 (A4 version of R1800) if you select Grayscale it only uses Matte black ink.

Hmmm, I thought Epson dropped the 'black only' option on this generation of printer (R800/1800) - I can't find anywhere to set it nor can I find a grayscale setting. Where do you set this Roy?

I agree about leaving the printer on - it avoids the charging cycle.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.