World Photography Forum

World Photography Forum (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/index.php)
-   Lenses (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   canon/sigma difference (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/showthread.php?t=2775)

crazee horse 12-10-07 17:34

canon/sigma difference
 
hi everyone, i currently have 350d, the kit lens (which i find ok) and a chocolate sigma 70-30 DG macro, im looking to sell this and upgrade to a canon 70-300 is usm. my question is, is it worth the change of lens, is the canon really that much better? thanks in advance,

Horse

miketoll 12-10-07 17:46

The Canon is sharper and you will find the IS a real boon as you are in effect handholding a 480mm lens. Love IS.

crazee horse 12-10-07 17:57

i"ll be honest the IS is whats making me look toward the canon, non IS shouldnt be allowed! lol

sassan 12-10-07 20:48

Make sure you don't get fooled by the slight lower price of the Canon 75-300 IS that is slightly slower but has a lot of more disadvantage compare to 70-300.
If you ask me, don't go for either. Instead wait till your budget is right for stepping into one of 4 sister 70-200mm (Whichever you can afford) that are a day and night difference in quality when compare to any other glass, including Canon's itself, for the given range. A lot of people have found the real photography after buying one of these L class lenses. You pay little more but you get what you want and more importantely, you don't have to pay twice or even more times...

miketoll 12-10-07 22:27

Certainly do not buy the Canon 75-300 IS which is the 70-300 IS's predecessor and is not very good at all (soft). The 70-200 L lenses have a very high reputation, the best compromise being the 70-200 f4 IS version as the f2.8 is large and heavy in comparison. Not as long a focal length as the 70-300 of course but you could always put a 1.4 converter on one when funds permit. Me? I have the 70-300 DO IS and although it is controversial I love it.

crazee horse 13-10-07 18:29

well to be honest i dont think i"ll ever be buying L lens"s, though i"d love one, i have been looking at the 70-300 IS USM, for around £375. the price is still a bit steep for me, but to spend over £500 on a lens............hmmmmmm no doubt they are a lot better but for me its an interest and not a proffession.

miketoll 13-10-07 20:40

Well the 70-300 IS you are looking at has a very high reputation and some people call it a ''hidden L lens'' as far as sharpness is concerned although not build quality. From what I have read you would be very happy with the results from this lens.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:05.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.