Thread: Raw vs jpeg
View Single Post
  #34  
Old 16-02-10, 21:42
johnjohn johnjohn is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: hythe
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by walwyn View Post
Last year a local newspaper wanted to use some images so I pointed them to my flickr account and told them to chose what they wanted and I'd let them have the hirez files. They responded that the 1200px images on flickr were perfectly good enough for them to print.

ImageKind produce Art Quality prints from your digital files. I'll let them speak about DPI PPI, and what modern printing techniques paper and ink can do.
no problem if you are happy with the result then fine. Printers tend to push DPI as high as posible and dye sub have more or infinite dots. on smaller prints difference is not noticable. when you start to print to A3 A2 you see loss rapidy even slight cropping makes a difference.

Vogue and such are printed at 2400 DPI photo used to have very small dots that is why they were so good compared to the past home prints.


I take your point and stand corrected.

many thanks

JOhn
Reply With Quote