Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex1994
OK, this forum has been a little slow in the past week, so I thought I'd spark some thought.
I personally believe primes to be superior to zooms:
Primes are:
- sharper glass for the money
- for the same price, faster glass
But a lot more money to cover the same focal range
- smaller and lighter
Not if you have to carry more glass overall
- tools that make you focus far more on composition, which is what really matters
Zooms are surely just huge, clumsy, threatening pieces of glass that deliver sub-par results, right?
You've obviously never used Oly HG/SHG zooms  |
Here's one I did earlier with with an EFL of 100-400, f2.8-3.1, weight <1kg and cost <£1K -
Morgan - I think you would be pushed to cover that range at that weight or price with primes