Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphire
Sassan, I was told years ago that the Mac was the one and only perfect graphics machine. ![EEK!](images/smilies/eek.gif) The more I read now, I have a deferent view ![Wink](images/smilies/wink.gif) , their seems to be less and less programs that work with mac now and its not as fast a it is made out to be. I think I will stay with Windows for the foreseeable future.
|
Canon Digital Photo Professional works beautifully on mac and beta 3.0
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
was available same time as PC version, only touch PSE now as a frame for neatimage and posibly levelling a horizon if it is up and GraphicConverter isn't.
Most people buy iMacs which are the stripped down cheapo version, often 1 chip behind and not surprisingly won't win any races. The macs for professional use are twin processor desktops and I think they still win many benchmark trials, ie in real use not nominal Hz.
Just jacked my 5 1/2year old Powerbook upto maximum memory and will probably give up computing and digital photography if it ever fails (...or maybe not
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
)