WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > General Photography > The Photography Forum


The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion.

About Wide Angle

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 22-01-12, 12:10
Peter Waites's Avatar
Peter Waites Peter Waites is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 7,264
Default About Wide Angle

My little Canon Ixus 700 has a focal length stated to be 7.7 - 23mm - seems pretty wide. Yet in practise I get more in shot with my 18-55 Nikon kit lens. Any thoughts/advice folks? Forgive me if it's a stupid question.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-01-12, 15:51
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

The Canon Ixus 700 has an equivalent focal length of 37mm to 111mm.

It is all to do with the very small sensor in the Ixus compared to your DSLR sensor size.

The crop factor for the Ixus is 4.8 were as the Nikon will be 1.5. You multiply the the real lens focal length by the crop factor to get the equivalent 35mm camera focal lenght.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-01-12, 15:53
Birdsnapper's Avatar
Birdsnapper Birdsnapper is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lincs
Posts: 5,667
Default

Peter, it is probably due to the Canon's small sensor and its crop factor, which could be in the range of 5 to six times those stated above. This would give a focal length of 35 - 45 mm. I can understand crop factor, but I'll be blowed if I can explain it in simple terms (or even complicated terms). I'm sure that there are web sites that can explain it with diagrams.

Rob posted his reply whilst I was writing mine - good explanation, Rob.
__________________
Mike
Nobody ever erected a statue of a critic
http://www.pbase.com/sunnycote
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-01-12, 16:29
Peter Waites's Avatar
Peter Waites Peter Waites is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 7,264
Default

Thank you both. I'm enlightened. I thought the Canon should be a good bet for this month's challenge but now I'm beginning to understand why it wont.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-12, 00:37
khmerxbxboi khmerxbxboi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oakland,CA
Posts: 6
Default

16mm is the best 1200 canon brand if not 10-20mm cheap $500.00 sigma

I do most of my landscape with a wide
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-03-12, 08:56
pauluk pauluk is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bucks
Posts: 4,848
Default

Peter I think Robski birdsnapper are right.Full Sensor (FF) 1:1 as 35mm used to be, cropped on DSLR 1.5 or 1.6 X the focal length on small sensor the factor is much larger giving a multiplying factor of more than 3 they used to mark Focal Length equiv to 35mm so this misunderstanding whould not happen but more recently with some manufacturers they give actual mm . I hope thats not to long winded.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-03-12, 20:36
Peter Waites's Avatar
Peter Waites Peter Waites is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 7,264
Default

Thanks Paul. That's a useful explanation.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-03-12, 20:53
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 48
Posts: 1,856
Default

This link might help, as long as you can dig through the waffle - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-03-12, 09:34
Peter Waites's Avatar
Peter Waites Peter Waites is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 7,264
Default

Thanks, I did look - but maybe I'll save that for a winter's day.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.