WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Advice re Macro lens?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-02-06, 13:59
Nogbad's Avatar
Nogbad Nogbad is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 496
Default Advice re Macro lens?

Hi all need some advice. I have a Nikon D70 and want to buy a macro lesns. Have some funds about £200-250 and had been looking at the Sigma 50mm F2.8 EX DG Macro.

Having looked at lenses in general there is a liitle confusion as to what magnification there is. I keep seeing comments re 1:1 ratio and 1:2 or 1:39. I assume the 1:1 is the best as this will be lifesize?

However Iwas wanting to get in close and see more details i.e more magnification!

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Nogbad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-06, 14:47
kennygee kennygee is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 122
Default

Nogbad

You may find this thread I started some time ago useful.

http://www.worldphotographyforum.com...hread.php?t=94
__________________
Cheers

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-06, 17:10
Nogbad's Avatar
Nogbad Nogbad is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 496
Default

Thanks Ken, it was very helpful and answered my questions. I will start trawling the web for the best prices.

Cheers

Nogbad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-06, 19:55
Subzero Subzero is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK/BRITTANY
Posts: 104
Default

Hi NOGBAD,
If you want big magnification get a microscope and camera adaptor.
If that's too big ,get a bellows as suggested in the other thread.
If you want to take normal things like bugs etc ,then indeed you will need a macro type lens.The shorter the focal lenght of the lens the closer you have to get to your subject.For example at it's NEAREST focus distance, the 60/2.8 NIKKOR is about 75mm from the front edge of the lens to the subject.The Sigma 105/2.8 is about 125mm from the front edge of the lens to the subject.
The reason I say this is because the closer you have get to your subject the more you are likely to frighten your "bug", and block out the light with your body/camera.
At the "shorter " end of the focal lengths, you can consider the 50mm Sigma, 60mm Nikkor,90mm Tamron, 105mm Nikkor and Sigma.If you can get a shop/store before you buy, try some and you will see what I mean.
Some of these lenses, new (may be outside of your budget) but can be found S/H within the price you have set as your target.
If you already knew all this then sorry, for wasting your time.
regards Subzero.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-06, 17:36
Nogbad's Avatar
Nogbad Nogbad is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 496
Default

Thanks Subzero, no I did'nt know that and it is useful. I have decided on the
Nikon 60mm macro as I want to take pictures of flowers and creepy crawlies which wont be too skittish. I am interested in moths and butterflies as well which I know I can get fairly close to.

Hopefully I can pick it up tomorrow and get to grips with it with some everyday things. The reason I went for the Nikon is, after searching on the web for reviews of all the lenses suggested there was'nt much between them. I got the impression the Nikon is optically better and I wish to make enlargements and put them in competitions at my photographic club and feel the image quality may be that little bit better.

Thanks to all for their comments, suggestions and advice. It has been really helpful.

Cheers

Nogbad
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-06, 09:33
ruchai ruchai is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sriracha,Thailand
Posts: 38
Default

Get the MacroNikkor 60mm. I got one recently and am very happy with it. Just the right focal lenght and weight. Superb picture quality. I use it nearly every night taking insect pictures of our garden. See here, the fly is about the size of a house fly. http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...cat/500/page/1
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-06, 10:17
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

Nogbad

This site is very useful for gauging the quality of lens

http://www.photozone.de/active/survey/querylens.jsp

It is one list that contains most lens.

It only takes a few seconds to gauge if a lens is poor, average or good quality.
Then you know what you are getting instead of being surprised pleasantly or not.

It's not Rocket Science

You will see the Nikkor 60mm scores much higher than the Sigma 50mm
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated

Last edited by robski; 07-02-06 at 13:45.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-06, 11:30
ruchai ruchai is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sriracha,Thailand
Posts: 38
Default

The MicroNikkor 60mm is an old lens. I does not have Nikkor new auto-focus-S. But it surprised me for sharpness. My only other macro lens is an 40 plus years old PentaxMacro 50mm. The auto-focus of the Nikkor 60mm really help.
I gave up comparing lenses from charts for a long long time. I am too old and prefer to spend my time photographing. Reviews from many experts in the net are more easy. I did not regret when I bought two Nikkors last year, the 80-400VR and the micro-nikkor 60mm. I do not think I shall need any other lens in a foreseeable future. The 80-400 for birds in the morning and evening and the micro-nikkor 60mm for insects at night.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-02-06, 15:15
GavinM GavinM is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 70
Default

I've got the 60mm f2.8 too and I would recommend it. You can use it for other things too.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-02-06, 00:41
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

I would recommend the Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro, it's a proven, versatile performer which is universally well esteemed. I would say it is the equal if not better than the Nikon or Canon macro lenses, (certainly a lot cheeper). I had the Nikkor 105mm Macro which I couldn't get on with, so I traded it in for a Tamron 90, I've never looked back, great lens, does all I wan't. The bonus is it becomes a 135mm Macro on a Nikon D70.

nirofo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.