WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > General Photography Technique


General Photography Technique Discussion on General Photography Technique

Help - Strange results with Remote Flash Triggeres

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-03-07, 10:19
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Unhappy Help - Strange results with Remote Flash Triggeres

I was taking some shots the other night to get an image of the person dreaming to comple my Dream Car image for this months competition.

I had my Canon 20D tripod mounted and a single flash fireing into a brolly off to one side. The flash was being triggered at this stage by a cable linked to the PC socket on the camera. I then decided that I needed a bit of fill in flash from the pop up on the camera. I took this opertunity to get rid of the wire trailing across the room to the brolly flash and fitted a remote light sensing trigger that would sense the pop up firing and fire the brolly flash.

Took the shot, the pop up fired, the brolly flash fired and guess what - the image was DARKER Hadnt really got time to mess around then so refitted the cable from camera PC socket to brolly and this time I got the fill in the I wanted.

This morning I've had the chance to experiment and see what happening. I set everything up and took some pictures of a white wall (which weren't that exciting ) but did enable me to see the amount of ilumination I was getting by looking at the resultant histograms - see attached). I had the camera set on manual 125 sec f8.0 ISO 100, flash sync set to 1st curtain sync (although I tried 2nd curtain and the results are the same)

First I took just the wall to guage the amount of ambient illumination. Then just the pop up flash to see how much light that was giving and then added the remote flash triggered by the slave. This is where thing get really odd and the illumination was LESS. How can that be

Then I tried the remote flash only triggered by the cable, then flipped the pop up as well. This gives the result I expected but didnt get using the slave trigger ie more light than either the remote or the pop up alone. I wondered if the remote slave was not acting fast enough to trigger the remote flash before the shutter closed. So I set up a second remote flash unit. Triggered the first one by the cable and the second one by a slave unit. White out - which proved that the slaves are acting fast enough. Flipping the pop up again resulted is a drop in ilumination - again slightly lower than the pop up + wire triggered remote on their own

Can anyone explain whats goin on and how to set things up for using multiple flashes triggered by slaves AND using the pop up of in fill?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Flash-Histograms.jpg (64.3 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-07, 10:38
Saphire's Avatar
Saphire Saphire is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shropshire
Age: 75
Posts: 5,980
Default

Clive when I had this problem I found that the pop up was giving off to much forward light. What I did to get the lighting right was to put a cover which is masked on one side over the pop up this masked the light going forward and sent the light backwards, it was the only way to get it to trigger the slave. I would think that is the same problem you are having when using the pop up for triggering, its giving you false lighting.
__________________
Christine Iwancz
Gallery upload limit is 4 photos per 24hrs Gallery Posting Guidelines here
http://ciphotography.freehostia.com/index.php
Equipment= Canon 7D, 40D, 400 f5.6, 75-300, 100mm Macro, 18-55, Canon 70-200 f4, Tokina 12-24mm, Kenko pro 300 1.4,1.5 and 2.0x, Jessops ext tube set,
Canon 580 flash. Home made ring flash. . Close-lens.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-07, 12:13
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphire View Post
Clive when I had this problem I found that the pop up was giving off to much forward light. What I did to get the lighting right was to put a cover which is masked on one side over the pop up this masked the light going forward and sent the light backwards, it was the only way to get it to trigger the slave. I would think that is the same problem you are having when using the pop up for triggering, its giving you false lighting.
Christine

Perhaps I should have said - the remote flashes are definitely triggering but somehow the camera is recording less light even though there is more light being generated. If it was just that the remotes were not triggering, then the histogram should be exactly the same as for just the pop up - but in fact the exposure is less
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-07, 12:21
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

The 20D pop up will be sending out a pre-flash for colour balance setting. This pre-flash will be triggering your slaves. You need a newer type of slave trigger that copes with preflash.

I've not seen them sold in this country but I did see them list on a USA website. They are quiet expensive compared to the cheap old style ones.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated

Last edited by robski; 02-03-07 at 12:23.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-07, 16:17
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robski View Post
The 20D pop up will be sending out a pre-flash for colour balance setting.
Rob - You may be right, although there is no discernable pre flash. Is there anyway to turn this off or override it? I've got red eye and focus assist both set to off. Following your post I've tried setting the white balance to manual which you would have thought would eliminate the need, but it seems to makes no difference
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-07, 16:23
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 8,486
Default

Clive,

You can verify if you are getting a pre-flash by looking through the viewfinder when you take the picture. If you have a pre-flash, this can be seen through the viewfinder immediately before the mirror goes up.

My Pentax(es) can have the pre-flash disabled by adjusting the flash settings combined with using manual exposure, I'd imagine there is a way to do this with the Canon.

Duncan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-07, 16:33
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

So info on the Canon ETTL system

http://photonotes.org/articles/eos-flash/

I don't believe you can disable the pre-flash. Difficult to see as it happens milli-seconds before the main flash.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-07, 16:35
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

I bought a cheap slave unit with the view of modifying it. It was a project for the winter months but there you go.

In the end I bought an off camera cord and extended the cable to 5 metres.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated

Last edited by robski; 02-03-07 at 16:37.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-07, 16:50
SeanKP SeanKP is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gidders View Post
Christine

Perhaps I should have said - the remote flashes are definitely triggering but somehow the camera is recording less light even though there is more light being generated. If it was just that the remotes were not triggering, then the histogram should be exactly the same as for just the pop up - but in fact the exposure is less
Hi Clive

I think it's a bit more complex than that. My understanding is that, assuming that you are not somehow overriding the ETTL, the camera will attempt to perfectly expose each picture. It does this by measuring the amount of light on the subject and switching the flash(es) off when it calculates that there is enough to generate a good exposure based upon the ISO, aperture and shutter speed.

In other words, all of your histograms should look exactly the same in an ideal world no matter how many flashes you use unless the camera is unable to quench the flashes quickly enough or if, say, one flash at full power was insufficient to light the scene properly.

In the real world however, it is possible that some light from your slave is getting back to the camera directly which the camera assumes has been reflected from the subject and the camera is fooled into thinking that more light has reached the subject than actually has done. It therefore quenches the strobes a fraction earlier than it otherwise would giving a slightly darker image.

The way to compensate for this is to adjust the flash exposure compensation function on your camera.

Does that make sense?

Oh, if you were to take a picture whilst pointing all relevant strobes at a bathroom mirror you should be able to see which strobe(s) are affecting your exposure from the resulting picture.

Sean
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-07, 17:06
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

Another link giving info on problems

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...ad.php?t=44351
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.