WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > General Photography Technique


General Photography Technique Discussion on General Photography Technique

Long lens technique

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 13-04-06, 12:42
Canis Vulpes's Avatar
Canis Vulpes Canis Vulpes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 4,398
Question Long lens technique

Since changing a few lenses from VR type to constant fast wide aperture I realize I need to improve lens holding technique. Using 28-70 f2.8 (7inches long) I cannot keep it steady for long at 50mm, compared with 50mm 1.8 (nifty fifty) I can hold nice a steady. Long focal length lenses used with TC's I have an almost impossible time into the TC extension focal length.

So...How should I handle my lenses to achieve sharp photos.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-04-06, 13:17
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 88
Posts: 1,325
Default

Right Stephen

Have the same problem - more so with static subjects - birds on the wing, cars, motor cycles etc seem to be less trouble. But at least with Digital it does'nt cost to practice.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-04-06, 13:35
Canis Vulpes's Avatar
Canis Vulpes Canis Vulpes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 4,398
Default

Exactly, still subjects. I never noticed when VR was compensating for my poor technique. VR has possibly lead to poor technique?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-04-06, 13:57
Annette's Avatar
Annette Annette is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bolton,Lancashire
Posts: 376
Default

Hi Stephan. I think maybe it depends upon what you are trying to photograph. With landscape and some wildlife a tripod or monopod is probably the best option if you are unsteady.
There are so many things that can affect focusing. When it comes to bird photography there are many things that can create softness, the wrong type of light, busy fore and back grounds and incorrect aperture settings being only a few.
If it is just hand holding techniques you need to brush up on then practise with different stance so that your arms are firmly tucked into your body and your legs are evenly spread for good balance. Also if at all possible look for anything, like a tree, fence etc that you could use for added support.
I am a pretty unfit not very strong woman and have used heavy long lenses successfully handheld. in the end it all comes down to technique and practice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-06, 14:14
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 88
Posts: 1,325
Default

Hi Annette
Right on - I see on your splendid webb site you are into a 500mm lens now - you cant be too unfit.

As you say - practice is the keyword.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-04-06, 14:21
Annette's Avatar
Annette Annette is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bolton,Lancashire
Posts: 376
Default

Actually prostie that needs upgrading. I now use a canon 400mm f/5.6L but the 500mm is a very sharp lens too in good to moderate light. My 13 year old son uses it now and gets very good results with it. I am unfit, overweight and suffer from fibromialgia so after a long day my muscles really dont like it but its what you get used to.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-04-06, 17:49
Nigel G's Avatar
Nigel G Nigel G is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Poole
Posts: 3,631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Fox
So...How should I handle my lenses to achieve sharp photos.

I asked the same question of BF a while back. This was the response with some useful links and advice.

http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=49218
__________________
Nigel
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-04-06, 18:05
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 48
Posts: 1,856
Default

Personally I almost always use a tripod and on the occassions that I don't I use some other support (beanbag, monopod) and only very rarely do I handhold. My main lens is a Sigma 500 f4.5, it's a big, heavy lens and to get sharp shots hand holding I need shutter speeds of 1/800th or faster, when it's on top of my tripod (Manfrotto 055 legs and a 501 head) I can get sharp shots of birds even down to 1/100th.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-04-06, 18:27
Annette's Avatar
Annette Annette is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bolton,Lancashire
Posts: 376
Default

Yeah but postie noone could successfully handhold the lens that you have got as it is far too heavy. Most other lenses from the sigm 170-500mm down are handholdable easily enough though. If I can do it anyone can.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 14-04-06, 02:01
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

I wouldn't dream of using my cameras without some sort of solid support, I use a heavy tripod for most of my work, except when I'm on a long walk or in the car. I normally use a Uniloc Major 1600 with large ball and socket or Manfrotto 128RC for landscape, close-up and long lens work and a Uniloc 1700 with ball and socket for long walks. For shooting from the car window I use a large purpose made bean bag filled not too tightly with dried peas, this enables me to use lenses up to 500mm with 2X converter. If the bag is not packed too tightly it allows you to snuggle the lens into it for a solid support. On the very rare occasion when I shoot without a support, it's usually a quick snap shot where I don't have time to anticipate the shot. The only other time I would work without a support is when doing flight shots of birds.

nirofo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.