It really depends on why you take pictures and what you do with them. Because I take so many of the same subject I regularly cull the stuff I think I've managed an improvement on with a later shot. I've just got a new laptop and have gone through all my old CDs and my PC hard drive and downloaded on to it copies of just the ones I really like plus the 'one offs' where I've managed a photo of sorts of a bird i rarely see etc.

Being able to cull the dross is an essential requirement for improvement. Most of us are not to good at this.:)

The key is to learn why they are dross and try to do better the next time. I keep a lot of dross because they are memories especially if the shots are of family and pets. Its only the absolute dross I bin. I also try to learn from other peoples shots ie if they are good why and how did they do it, if not so good why and what could be done to improve them?

I actually disagree with the original quote, since as you say, you have to learn from mistakes. Looking back, I wonder why it took me so long to learn what now seems obvious. I also wonder why it is taking me so long to learn new skills. I guess it's a sad fact that the only way to learn is to do, and figure out what went wrong, or what went right.

I guess it's a sad fact that the only way to learn is to do, and figure out what went wrong, or what went right.[/quote]

I dont think that's sad - I find it motivates me to do more!
As to what is 'good' - it depends on what the photo is for. Memories are important, even if aesthetically the images are weak, so a 'good' memory can make a 'good' photo. There are all sorts of perceived rules about 'good' technique and composition, colour theory etc. But, perception is everything in aesthetics! If it looks good to you then it is good! Learn what looks good to you and why, then try and do it again.:)

Photography is an art form. Artists rarely create for others, they create for themselves. That is: they do what pleases them. If you are pleased with your photos (creations) then you are a good photographer.

The nice thing about this forum is that you do not have to be 'good' to start, but improvement comes with taking notice of the advice given.

Also a bit wary about over zealous culling; I am now able to rescue quite a few shots as PP skills improve that were admittedly badly exposed but I liked composition or knew I could not retake.

I think some people are missing the point. You don’t actually have to bin / delete / cull anything; you just have to be selective in what you publish. That is, only show your best pictures. This will not make you a better photographer but it will improve your reputation, therefore people who view your pictures will believe you are a good photographer.

been reading all about throwing away photos, total agree with all thats said, i use to tend to keep photos, i think ok, then to b told no its not ekkkkkkk where do i go from here, been taking photos since november, iam the worlds critict on my photos, now, throw more away then i keep

can anybody tell where the crititces page is please

The ability to look at a photo you've taken yourself and be honest is a quality in itself.
Most of the time people couldn't give a flying whatsit on how difficult a shot was. The final result is all that matters, full stop.
...which is a reason why I feel forums like this are good.....like minded folks who know what might have been involved to get the shot are more likely able to relate to the 'story' behind a shot.