![]() |
Clive,
I'm sure the pics of your set up will be very helpful to Postie. Your lights look interesting and would certainly be a lot better than my early tungsten lighting kit. That was a killer for heat hence my early move to flash. I've taken the liberty of finding a link to Interfits web site for these. http://www.interfitphotographic.com/...l-lite%205.php I guess the next question will revolve around backgrounds - materials, colours etc. Don |
Quote:
|
I do not know if Clive has used a flash set up in a studio for his views on comparison, so I'll chuck these comments into the ring.
The primary advantage of Continuous Light is that it is significantly cheaper than flash. Easy to work out light positioning, although decent studio flash units do have modelling lamps. Easy exposure calculation - meter direct off the subject. The downside of continuous light is lack of faster speeds to freeze motion. Serious light output from pro kit needed to get you there. The only down side of flash that I can think of is the higher initial cost and the learning curve. Once you understand the basics of flash you may find you do not even use the modelling lights and setting up is just as easy as with continuous light. Either way set up is just the same. The main advantage of flash is the ability to freeze motion. It is the short flash duration rather than shutter speed that helps here. So even if your camera has a slow sync speed the flash duration will exceed 1/500 sec. Studio units have faster recycling times than camera units and can withstand far heavier useage over a short period of time without overheating. I hope this is of some help. Don |
Not wanting to sound sexist, but if you get into serious tungsten lighting then you can have Blondes and Redheads. :D :D
Technical name for certain types of light. :rolleyes: Don |
Thanks for all the advice Don... but I've decided to be guided by my wallet!
A friend bought a continuous light set up earlier in the year for a specific job but is no longer using it. He's been very upfront about it's limitations and the advantages that a flash set up would have. But he's willing to sell it on at a good price (including a background set up) so I figure it's a good way to dip my toe in the water. If I don't get on with it then I won't loose too much, if I do I can look to add a flash set up later on (when I'll hopefully be able to afford a better one). |
Excellent job, and I am sure you will have a lot of fun. Also well worth going back through Clives gallery for some portrait tips.
I am sure that I speak for others as well when I say we will be interested to know how you get on. Don |
Now I'm having a re-think (could I be more indecisive) and am now swaying towards a flash set up... I've been reading a lot and it seems that while continuous light is fine for head and shoulder portraits it's not so good for groups. Having looked at the ones Don linked to I'm thinking I may go for an Elinchrome D-lite set up. Looking at the D-ilte 2 it has a faster recycle time but lower power than the D-lite 4, anyone got any opinions on which is better?
|
In lighting there is a saying " You can never have too much power ". So it really is down to what you can afford. The price difference of £100 between the D light 2 and 4 buys you one more available stop of light. If you are thinking of groups then that could be valuable from a dof point of view.
Specs wise both D lights are adjustable over a 5 stop range. Reclyle times are 0.7 secs. The lower powered D-Light 2 gives a 1/1200 sec flash duration and the D-Light 4 gives 1/800 sec duration. Ignore flash duration as it is immaterial for what you are going to do. So in the end if you can run to a D-Light 4 then thats the one to go for. Link to Elinchrom web site http://www.elinchrom.com/ Don |
Postcard, someone on Birdforum is selling a set-up you may be interested in.
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=117946 |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.