World Photography Forum

World Photography Forum (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/index.php)
-   General Photography Technique (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Hand holding - man vs. woman (https://www.worldphotographyforum.com/showthread.php?t=479)

Annette 17-01-06 12:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by pxl8
Hmm, where do I fit in then? I'm left handed - but for writing only...

Depends what attributes you have px18? ;)

Andy 17-01-06 13:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adey Baker
The left-handed bit is perfectly genuine, btw. Being left-handed myself, I've appreciated that my stronger, more controlled arm is the one bracing the lens which I'm sure can be a help.

I think I can see where Adey is coming from, not dissimilar to driving a manual car (in the U.K), the powerful and more controlled arm is on the side of the gearstick.

Anyway, I just can't get used to holding a camera... how can i have a cigarette in one hand and take a photo without a tripod? :D

robski 17-01-06 22:48

Are we talking about weight lifting or do hairy legs give you a better stance ?

Andy I thought you had all mod cons, It's a cup of coffee in one hand, Cigarette in the other and fire the remote shutter release button with your back side.

kwpenland 18-01-06 04:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by robski
Are we talking about weight lifting or do hairy legs give you a better stance ?

So if we ladies don't shave for a fortnight...? :eek:

yelvertoft 18-01-06 08:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by robski
Are we talking about weight lifting or do hairy legs give you a better stance ?

As has been discussed elsewhere, wind induced vibration is a problem on tripod legs. Research has proven that slightly hairy legs are actually more aerodynamic than shaved legs. I used to do bicycle racing, such things get discussed. Perhaps men wearing shorts, or unkempt women have a previously unknown advantage.

Adey Baker 18-01-06 12:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by yelvertoft
Research has proven that slightly hairy legs are actually more aerodynamic than shaved legs. I used to do bicycle racing, such things get discussed. Perhaps men wearing shorts, or unkempt women have a previously unknown advantage.

My left-handed comments are starting to look quite sane, now!;)

robski 18-01-06 13:35

So Ducan have you taken to wearing the brightly coloured Lycra shorts when your out and about talking shots with your left handed long lens ? ;)

greypoint 18-01-06 15:12

I am reading this at work and trying to work out how upper body accoutrements either help or hinder my handholding - difficult without a camera....

yelvertoft 18-01-06 17:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by robski
have you taken to wearing the brightly coloured Lycra shorts when your out and about talking shots with your left handed long lens ? ;)

I've been banned from wearing my red shorts in public, stricktly indoor trainer use only now. Can be a touch embarrassing, but the girls like them.

I don't shave below my legs any more, it clogs up the plug-hole. Why do cyclist's do it? Vanity and peer pressure, any other reason given is just a cover up for the truth. It's simply part of the culture.

Oh, and yes, I'm left handed. There seems to be a lot of lefty's here, perhaps a new thread with a poll out of interest?

Duncan.

Andy 18-01-06 19:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by yelvertoft
There seems to be a lot of lefty's here, perhaps a new thread with a poll out of interest?

Duncan.

Word has it that we're more creative than 'righties' ;)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.