Very good point Alex,:o - I agree and some of us (namely me) can be so infected with Nikon Acquisition Syndrome that we have to be strapped down, foaming at the mouth when ever something new in black and gold appears. That said a second OM 10 ? body from the 70's may be worth saving for?

Well all is said and done, people can get excellent photos from cameraphones. Too often I think we are obsessed with technical details and quality that most couldn't care less about.

Buy whatever kit you think will work for you, but don't be surprised when someone with kit costing a fraction of the price gets amazing results too.

That's a real bugger .... but so true

Don't forget that the best lens is the one you have with you, on a camera that works, loaded with a fresh memory card or a roll of film ;-)

Only true up to a point.The best lens you have with you is the one you have with you if you only have one with you. If you see an extremely rare nervous bird a long way away and you have only got a 10mm wide angle with you don't bother but just enjoy the sight!

Unlikely that the only worthwhile sight on that trip would have been just the bird - I'm sure there would have been possibilities to use the 10mm as well.

Well I have had this situation where I have gone out with a particular purpose in mind armed with only a wide zoom (10-20mm) only to find that the only thing really worth shooting was a distant rare bird that I would probably never see again. My wife, bless her, just said sweetly 'never mind dear just be glad you saw it at all, enjoy it, and forget your camera for once'. She had a point but it is not easy to do, it rankles. It is the old argument of how much weight of gear to carry around and zooms certainly help but Sods Law strikes! Incidentally Sod was a real bloke, must have loved his name. Actually when planning a day out with the camera it is more Howes Law but never mind.

Very easy for me I just have to decide whether to take the Raynox DCR-250 or DCR-150 along with the pana. All fits nicely into a bag I can clip to my belt.

Thats ok, he just gets out his 35mm, 28mm or 17mm prime instead...Primes are small and light so its easy to carry several with you so you can cover a range of focal lengths and whichever you use will give you excellent quality...As opposed to the so-so quality at a range of focal lengths you get with a zoom.;)

I agree with the previous comments about old chestnut, perhaps this may have been more important ten years ago, but I remember carrying my Nikon F Photomic Ftn, 28mm, 50mm, 135mm, 200mm, 300mm, 500mm.

I now have a Canon, Canon 28-135 and Sigma 120-400. My 16 year old son a Nikon and Nikkor 28-300, NO primes, no weight issues.