![]()  | 
	
		
 Prehaps they should of incresed the FPS, that way it would be much more appealing to bird photographers. 
	 | 
		
 New Canon 
		
		
			1 Attachment(s) 
		
		I'm surprised no-one has posted the picture of it yet.  Have you seen all the other functions it has available at the press of a button?  :eek:  
	Andy, we really do need a "Tongue in cheek" smiley.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 After seeing that pic, it looks like a good long read through the manual would be a good idea. ant ps, how much is it for a coke?  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 5fps is plenty for bird photography... I have 8fps available and never needed to use it, even though it sounds impressive. cheers, Andy  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 I've just replied on Birdforum that I think a reduction in noise of the shutter would be the best feature to check out for anyone into wildlife photography. I've hardly ever needed more than 5 or 6 shots in a sequence (with that noisy 20D shutter the bird is long gone before you'll need more shots;) ) so the up-graded buffer is not that important to me. The 100,000-frame shutter might be useful for someone looking to actually keep one of these rather than up-grding every few years... I reckon a digital equivalent of the EOS3 body would be Canon's long-term goal in the mid-range market - something that would give them a long production run that wouldn't need up-dating all the time. Whatever happened to the 400mm F5'6 lens upgrade that the dealers' shelves have been cleared for...:rolleyes:  | 
		
 Never really understood why dslr's are so much noisier than our old 35mm slr's... with a smaller sensor, the mirror should be smaller and need less powerful spings. I suppose we have far faster shutter-speeds available thesedays and 5fps+, so they are more substantially powered? 
	cheers, Andy  | 
		
 I like the idea of a spot meter - I had terrible trouble yesterday with the Kingfishers, due to the weather the lighting kept changing, and the only place I could sit hidden on a particular perch meant the reflection in the river behind was bright and the birds were in shadow. I can't believe Canon haven't included ths previously. The other features I'm not so much bothered about.  
	The only other thing I'd like to see in a camera is that it takes the picture in manual mode when I press the button, I've had a few instances where the camera has decided the setting I've chosen aren't correct and the shutter won't fire, a quick change of say aperture or shutter change this but negate the purpose of manual.  | 
		
 Is'nt it nice to be a contented Nikon owner?! 
	 | 
		
 At £1180 I certainly will not be queing up for one. 
	Harry  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:22. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.