![]()  | 
	
		
 I really must'nt spend any money on photo stuff for a while - if and when I can afford it, the decision must be between a longer, good quality lens, or a D200 with it's extra mp. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Don  | 
		
 My Canon 20D was presented with a big brother for Christmas the 1DmkIIN. 
	Now he needs a few tips on the finer points of shooting with his new sibling, using either his 70-200 F/2.8L IS or 300f/4L IS with or without his 1.4 & x2TC. He hopes to add the 400f/5.6L at some future date. He also hopes he will not be made redundant!!!!!  | 
		
 I've just bought a Nikon D200 and 80-400 VR, I would now like a AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8D VR but I think my Bank Manager would kill me. Unless I come up on the Lotto or Premium Bonds!!! 
	 | 
		
 Got the 350D yeasterday. next stop, the sigma 175-500 and a good (and low cost) tripod. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Edit=Looks like He's not selling it any more.  | 
		
 Sigma 170-500 
		
		
		I have been using the Sigma 170-500 for approx. 4 years on a Pentax MZ7 & MZ6 with excellent results.  I just bought a Pentax istDS2 and the Sigma is fantastic. I took all my lenses to the store before I bought the DS2 to try them and even the staff were impressed with the quality of the images. 
	When I bought mine new I paid around $1000 CDN and $150 CDN for a circular polarizer. Filter size (from memory) is 86mm.  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Ordered about 3:00pm yesterday, it arrived before 1:00pm today and seems a nice piece of kit. Not sure whether I can get on with the ball head (bit of practice in use required, I think) but the pan head off my old Velbon fits it anyway, so I'll be able to use it without problems until I can afford the Fluide head that I would have chosen had funds allowed!  | 
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.