Which Macro Lens?
 

Hi All,

In have recently discovered the world of macro photography and I am looking at purchasing my first macro lens. I have a D90 and am looking at the Nikkor Micro 60mm f2.8, Nikkor Micro 105mm f2.8 or the Tamron 90mm macro lens.

Can anyone help with me with choosing the best lens. I want to take photos of all things small not just one particular item.

Thanks

Try the Sigma 105mm macro

How does the Sigma 105mm compare to the Nikkor lenses? I don't mind spending the extra money on a better lens.

Is it better to ge the longer focal length lens?

Thanks,

It compares very well, in fact I own one. You really need one with a longer focal length. The sigma scores on being in the same class as the 105mm Nikor but is considerably cheaper, Whatever you do though don't buy one with a short focal length just because it is cheaper, they can make it difficult to get close to your subject.

Great and thanks again. I'll see if any of my local camera stores carry the Sigma 105mm in stock. Lens prices here in Oz are going up by around 20% so its advantageous to buy what the retailer has in stock instead of ordering one in.

Weeds.

Hi there, I have the 105mm micro Nikkor and the 70-180 Micro Nikkor, which I use in conjunction with screw in close-up filters. I would recommend either. If you are using a tripod you do not need the VR function so a second hand older 105 will do very well. Both these lenses have the advantage of enabling you to stand off from the subject so you do not disturb it. The zoom micro enables you to focus and then frame. If you can afford it, go for Nikkor lenses every time - it's the best long term investment.

I suppose it depends on what you mean by the 'world of macro photography.' Static 'still-life' or wildlife, etc? Macro means large and usually refers to life-size or greater (at the film-plane in the camera) but in general use means close-up. Many wildlife subjects, such as butterflies, dragonflies, etc., don't need the closest focus distance on the lens but do benefit from the optical corrections designed into macro lenses. All of the lenses you've mentioned are fine as far as quality of the image goes.

Any of the lenses you shortlisted will give good image quality. I use the Sigma 105 and am very happy with it. As Adey says, a lot depends on what you want to do with your lens. You are in the best position to decide which is hte best for you.

As you say, there's a cost benefit in buying something that's in stock, so go into shops and try lenses. Pick the one that you are happiest with.

A block macro lens with long focal length is a good investment.
Let me throw a stone at hornets nest...why not a 200mm macro? :D

You'll struggle less to get a good shot for sure.

If you already have a zoom lens why not try a Raynox DCR-250 at £35?