View Single Post
  #9  
Old 16-01-07, 19:34
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant View Post
However, one choice would be to get the 18-200 and if you eventually need extra reach you could always buy a tele-converter
As Stephen Fox has pointed out in another thread elsewhere recently, tele-converters should only really be used with very, very good quality lenses. I know that if I use my t/con with my cheap Sigma 135-400 I get awful results. The two Tamron superzooms that Trinity is considering are very much convenience, consumer lenses (as Robski has already pointed out). I certainly wouldn't consider using a t/con with either of these lenses. If you need more reach later, there's plenty of 75-300 models that would do better than an 18-200 with a t/con attached.

Just my two penneth.
Reply With Quote