View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-08-07, 19:20
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daedal View Post
Oh dear, back to compromise: as I understand it sRGB is more limited than either Adobe RGB and apple RGB. I have the camera set to Adobe RGB and all graphics programmes that have a setting to apple RGB. I think i will stick to that and have accepted that some viewers will be seeing paler version...but from brief tangle with PC monitor, that may not be a bad thing.
Chris

I think you are missing the point here. As I understand it monitors can not display the whole of the sRBG colour space - LCD/TFT ones more so that CRT, and therefore the greater gamut of the Adobe RGB colour space is wasted when you view on screen - the benefit comes when you produce hard copy. If you stick to posting images in Apple RSB colour space you will need to accept the the majority - not some - of viewers will not see your images as you do on your screen.

That said, the images that you have posted in your gallery in Apple RSB (not sure how this compares with Adobe RGB) look well saturated on my (calibrated) monitor in firefox
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote