Thanks Michael. My first choice was the Canon 100 - 400 USM IS but it's almost double the cost of the Tamron. I looked at your Fulmar pictures, thanks for the link.
I have a Sigma 70 -300 and a Canon 75 - 300 plus a 1.4 converter but am still looking for more reach but I don't really want to sacrifice quality. I think that I'll give the situation more thought.
|