Nikon 200mm macro f4 af
I have searched the forums here and unless its really archived? the 200mm f4 AF isn't mentioned a great deal. Is this because its a huge beast and in price and better for full frame format? sorry to quote Mr Rockwell, but his review sways to this being the holy grail so to speak! most people appear to have the nikon 105mm or other make's in their inventory.
I have been contemplating getting into macro photography and possibly the 200mm len's, but if it means scaffold poles, difficult for a mere novice such as I etc, then maybe a DX 85mm is the better choice?
Thanks and patience in advance, from someone with a little knowledge, "which can be dangerous"
|