View Single Post
  #10  
Old 06-04-10, 00:27
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

The 70-300 IS is a lot cheaper than the DO version, & although slightly bigger, its lighter & no slouch in IQ terms ... then you could afford the IS macro

Check out the review at http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/20...report--review

Conclusion : ".....The optical performance of the new EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 USM IS (non-DO) is simply about as good. Mechanically it isn't quite in the same league as the DO lens but ... hey - it comes at a 50% lower price tag! If we throw in the added values plus a little coolness factor the DO lens may be worth a 200-250 EUR/$ premium over the conventional lens but at 1100 EUR/US$ it is simply way over-priced"

.... and prices have gone up since that was written
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com

Last edited by Gidders; 06-04-10 at 00:40.
Reply With Quote