Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Saphire
I have just been running some tests on the above quote. Whenever I had to resize an image I would just resize in CS with image resize in small increments on a jpg image. I have just done a resize using the above method and the method I normaly use, I am very surprised at the diference at the same magnification. I have put a sample so you can see the diference.
Thanks Stephen for sharing that one I didn't know about it.
|
You are welcome
So, to sum up and clarify, are you saying that in your example, the left hand image in each pair is the one interpolated in the raw conversion, and the right hand image in each pair is using your regular step interpolation in CS? The difference is certainly marked. I wonder if the same difference is there with downsizing
FYI it is commonly accepted that stepped interpolation is not the best method, especially for relatively small upsizing. It is reckoned to be best to do it in one go using bicubic interpolation. Again I have never compared the two methods.