View Single Post
  #4  
Old 20-05-06, 21:57
Andy's Avatar
Andy Andy is offline  
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bpw
Thanks Andy,

I’ve had a look at the 30D on the Canon website. This would give me another 1.9 MP, an additional 2fps, and another 2 images in a burst. Would I notice a significant difference with my type of photography?

The price is a lot less than I expected, I paid £1,150 for my 10D!
I think you'll notice a substantial difference between 3fps and 5fps, the latter being very rapid and is about as much as you'll ever need for bird photography.

The resolution aspect is minor but is beneficial when you need to crop... a fraction more leeway (or focal length if you want to look at it that way)

I'm not sure on shutter-lag times, but I suspect the 30d is pretty much state of the art and instantaneous, the 10d is a fairly old camera and shutter-lag times have improved a lot since then.

I think noise at high iso settings is going to be another plus point, the 20d was a good leap forward in that, and the 30d will not be worse.

I suspect battery life has improved considerably since the 10d... and that is always a big help.

If you had a 20d, it's be a struggle to recommend going to the 30d... but the 10d to 30d has got to be worthwhile.

The 30D looks to be excellent value at the moment, well below the £1k barrier.

cheers,
Andy
Reply With Quote