View Single Post
  #5  
Old 19-02-06, 11:36
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

So your not going to hazzard a guess which is the raw version then Stephen ?

This experiment I have done several times with the 20D and 300D and the difference between fine jpeg and raw is marginal if you have a well exposed image. In my case I don't think it is worth the investment of extra storage to process every shot as raw. The point I am making is that those who only use jpeg should not feel like second class citizens or they are missing out on a big improvement. Raw does have a bigger advantage if the shot was taken with incorrect settings to correct the error or you generate 16 bit tiff for printing. However I have found that raw is not bullet proof in saving bad images.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote