View Single Post
  #25  
Old 24-08-10, 20:08
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,490
Default

When you have developed the film and finally scanned them into the computer which must take quite some time (let's say the 2.5 hours already suggested as excellent) then you are finally at the same stage as the downloaded RAW files which would take just a few minutes to download, from then on the work flow for the film generated files and the digitally generated ones is essentially the same. Just as you would not manipulate every film image you would not process every digital file either but just select the best ones so again your 'logic' is rather illogical. As for machine gunning with digital it is certainly a temptation but that is, as has been said, down to your self discipline and not down to the medium. By the way film SLR cameras are not necessarily smaller than digital SLR's - my digital Canons are smaller than my EOS 3 and Fd mount cameras. The Olympus OM1 was exceptionally small for it's day compared to any other SLR available at the time, the exception rather than the rule.
Reply With Quote