View Single Post
  #5  
Old 18-03-07, 08:30
Tannin's Avatar
Tannin Tannin is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 288
Default

Hi Anja,

Simple advice from me: double or nothing. I think you will find that a cheap long lens will be pretty much a complete waste of money. Much better to either double your budget (maybe a bit more than double) or else do without. Cheap and nasty optical gear is never worth it, in my experience.

Either step up to one of the several well-regarded "cheapish" lenses in the 400mm+ class (Sigma 50-500 and Canon 400 f/5.6 are examples), or else accept that you are limited to 300mm.

You can get away with a cheap little lens (the Canon 18-55 kit lens, for example, costs about US$80 and works just fine) but you can't get away with a cheap big lens.

Last edited by Tannin; 18-03-07 at 08:31. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote