Thread: Stock photos?
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 14-01-06, 23:09
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

I suppose it depends on where you draw the line and what interpetation one is meant to put on the finished product. We have to remember that the photographic process is pretty poor at capturing the extremes in life. Do we say that we can only photography subjects which do not exceed the limits of the latitude of the photographic medium. Is using a polarizing or graduated filter on the camera to control light levels cheating ? To take this a step further, is taking two exposure levels of the same scene and making a composite cheating in order to reproduce what the eye perceives ? The next step of taking a sky from different time and place to achive the same effect is this not much the same. Most advertising shots are heavierly touched up and air brushed but do we feel conned ? If the sky was changed to add more drama then this is into the realms of digital manipulation. I think it is only cheating when you intend to deceive the viewer that you exposed the shot as is.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote