View Single Post
  #3  
Old 29-03-06, 09:44
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

I'd go along with Jim.

L lens are heavy compared to cheaper lens because of the wieght of the better quaility glass and stronger build. But you get used to the weight.

The 400mm f5.6 is a good sharp (fairly light) lens favoured by many.

The 100-400 is versatile but not the best.

I have the 300mm f4 and use it with a 1.4 TC. Putting the TC on and off effectively gives you a bit of zoom range. Also the minimum focus distance of 1.5m is useful for getting close to subject.

I think it is a good general purpose wildlife lens. As Jim says if your subject is always on the horizon then a lens never seems to be long enough.

The 70-200 f4 is cheap and light weight as well. If your subject is large and close this maybe a good option.

The trouble is when folk say wildlife it cover a multitude of sins. So how big is your subject ?

Small Insects, Butterflies, small birds, large birds, distant birds or large Mamals.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote