|  | 
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
|  | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
 | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Lenses Discussion of Lenses | 
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  Canon 17-85mm USM IS lens advice 
			
			Looking for some advice i have a canon 400d and currently have a sigma 17-70mm 2.8 have been looking at buying the canon 17-85mm EFS USM IS lens will this work fine on my 400d ? and whats the image quality like compared to the sigma any advice welcome thanks in advance Jim 
				__________________ www.scotlandpixs.co.uk http://www.photo4me.com/jimsloan http://500px.com/jimsloan | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Have a look at the reviews on www.slrgear.com and www.photozone.de - they both test both lenses. I'm not sure what you think your getting moving to the Canon lens ... another 15 mm & IS but its slower in terms of maximum aperture. I used to have the Canon lens a while ago ... and its not a stellar performer in their range particularly at the wide end where it suffered from severe barrel distortion & CA. Their newer 15-85 is a much better performer - I hired one last year to go on holiday rather than take my 24-105 &10-22 and was very happy with the results... although it is more expensive | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I concur with what Clive says. I do have one and the barrel distortion at the 17mm end is the main downside to my mind. Not a bad lens mind you but by al accounts nowhere near as good as the new, more expensive, 15-85 but I cannot justify the upgrade myself.
		 | 
|  | 
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| 
 | 
 |