![]() |
Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
Photographic Accessories Discussion on other Photography related Equipment. Tripods, Luggage and suchlike. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd agree with others that a cheap tripod is a false enconomy.
I started off with a cheap Velbon, it did the job, but suffered badly from vibrations. Finally I cracked and bought my first Manfrotto, what a difference it made, the legs are solid and the head stays where I lock it. I've had a few sets of Manfrotto legs over the years and have found the bigger ones (055) to be noticeably more stable than the smaller ones (190). Last week I finally got a set of Gitzo legs... wow. They are amazing at full extent they are taller than me, but remain rock solid. At the height I use them there seems to be no movement or vibration at all. They are simply amazing. If you can afford a set of Gitzo legs then I honestly think they are worth the high price tag. If not then get a got set of Manfrotto legs, you'll be very happy with them as long as you never try a Gitzo.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37669825@N04/ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One thing to bear in mind is the fact that you can often 'mix and match' legs and heads from different makers to get the ideal combination.
I've got a Gitzo with two heads and two columns but, despite being a nominal French company, everything is 'Made in Italy' so it's probably all made by Manfrotto anyway! (I believe the same company owns them both)
__________________
Adey http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805 'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think you are right, I know I've seen Gitzo heads in the past that had Manfrotto branding on the box.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37669825@N04/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct, they're owned by the Vinten Group.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yep, although Gitzo and Manfrotto/Bogen are quite separate in many was... as much as I'm friendly with Manfrotto and get bits to review, I'm not expecting any Gitzo goodies. They keep to themselves and regard eachother as competitors.
__________________
Digiscoped.Com - Bird Photography Andy Bright.Com - Laughable Aviation Photography |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
so now the golden question who sells the cheapest tripods in the U.K?
![]() ![]()
__________________
Weapons of choice, Panasonic FZ8, Canon 350d,Sigma 70-300 DG Macro Serious? Me? Not in this lifetime....... ![]() Last edited by crazee horse; 14-06-07 at 20:39. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Crazee,
For the kind of use you describe, I would say you'd be better off with something a bit meatier than the 190. I've never been impressed by the basic 190 model and cannot for the life of me understand why it is held in such high regard. It's OK, but nothing special. For big lenses (wildlife) or extreme close ups, I'd say you'd be better off looking at the 055 range. As for supply with a head, most 'high end' manufacturer's do not supply with a head as standard, but often dealers will do a legs/head bundle deal. Take a look at http://www.cameraworld.co.uk/tripods...ryname=Tripods for some pretty good deals. I hate to say this, but, the kind of head that will be most suitable for wildlife may not be suited to macro. Depending on which subject is going to be your main use, pick the right head. Personally, I use a head with 3 separate axes (Manfrotto 460RC) for macro, and a pan/tilt (Manfrotto 128RC) for long lens/digiscoping. Oh, and a 486RC ball head on my monopod. Horses for courses. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The other thing about the 190 is that it does not go all that high without raising the centre column which makes it more unstable so if you don't want a crick in your neck when shooting wildlife the 055 is better, the downside is of course it's heavier. I have been thinking about getting a carbon fibre 055 for ages but the money is the problem and of course persuading the wife I need another tripod when I already have a ''perfectly good one already that you have had for 30 years and you never use anyway''
![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
ha,ha,ha,ha,ha im a decorator by trade, and am currently "doing" the kitchen, ive been giving her quotes for the work done but she"s having non of it, i"ll push for a tripod "payoff" lol ive just been looking at a web site and they said the 055 is for small to medium cameras! would it be "man" enough for the 350d and a weighty lens?
__________________
Weapons of choice, Panasonic FZ8, Canon 350d,Sigma 70-300 DG Macro Serious? Me? Not in this lifetime....... ![]() Last edited by crazee horse; 15-06-07 at 18:18. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 055 plus RC128 head takes the weight of 20D 300mm F4 and x1.4TC with no problems ( combined weight about 2 kilo grammes ) or about 4.5 lb in old money.
__________________
Rob ----------------------------------------------------- Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2 Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea. WPF Gallery Birdforum Gallery |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|