![]()  | 
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
  | 
  |
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Lenses Discussion of Lenses | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			hi everyone,  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			ive been looking at getting a lens with a fixed focal length for macro shots and came across this one http://www.sigma-imaging-uk.com/lenses/macro/50mm.htm i was wondering if anybody had any experience with this lens, and if it was worth dipping into my pocket for as i have seen one brand new for £159 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	And may your limits be unknown And may your efforts be your own..  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Not experience but it was certainly well written about in the mags. The main drawback as I see it is how close to the subject you have to be so it very much depends on what you want macro shots of.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Try Googling 'Fredmiranda' and 'Photozone' for lens reviews.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Its also been reviewed on slrgear.com 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Try one in a shop the ensure that you will be happy wth the close working distances that you'll experience with this lens compared to say the Sigma 105 f2.8  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			might do that, i was looking at the sigma 105 but its about an extra £100 for the pleasure of standing an extra 1/2 meter back
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	And may your limits be unknown And may your efforts be your own..  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Standing that extra 1/2 metre back may well mean your subject it still there to be photographed. I use the Sigma 150 and can still feel too close. If your subject is not going to move away then the 50mm would be fine. I use mine mainly for butterflies and other insects.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Personally I'd opt for the Sigma 105mm DG macro, you will be able to get good results and you will be that bit further away from your subject.  I have the 105 and find it good for insects and I've also used it for portraits. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Alan  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			thanks for your help
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	And may your limits be unknown And may your efforts be your own..  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			PM SDPhotography (Scott), I know he has just bought this lens. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
	
	I'm looking at the 70mm myself as another option to the 180mm I have. Jason  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
		
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |