![]()  | 
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
  | 
  |
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
| Lenses Discussion of Lenses | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			So what's with this new model, then - 'up to four shutter speeds slower' hand-held with the VR from near infinity to 3m (1/30th life-size)?  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Why are they being coy about it's hand-holdability in the macro-range? 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Adey http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805 'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 The new 105 offers VFS which is great for out door shooters , but the range has gone to 3mtrs and the front element from 50 - 62mm, I would rather shoot that distance with a 70 - 200AFS VR.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
||||
		
		
  | 
||||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			On paper it sounds very nice indeed. It's nice to see Nikon stepping outside the conventional and adding IS (sorry, VR) to a lens class that has never had it before. It's a bit weird having it cut out at close focusing distances though, sort of defeats a lot of the point. Doubtless there is a white paper describing the reasoning behind it somewhere.   
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Interesting to see that, in a sense, the big two have done the same thing just now: introduce IS/VR to a lens type that has traditionally never had it and, say some, cannot benefit from it. The Nikon 105 macro VR and the Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS in the same week. Are we heading for a world where all lenses except the cheapest ones have IS/VR? Or is this Canon and Nikon racing to get IS/VR in as many lenses as possible before Sony debut a Minolta-based DSLR with IS in-body?  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			For interest  only??there is a "short review" of this lens at www.nikoncafe.com/vforums/showthread.php?t=64014 for anyone who might be interested. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	regards Subzero.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Although this lens was designed as a macro lens, it works extreemly well with the 1.4 and 1.7 TC making it a versitile travel lens. I never thought of using TC's on it until I read one of the big names in the "Nikon" world was doing this and loving it. Try it, it will bring a smile to your face with the results. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	www.imagesbymichaelrogers.com  | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |