WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

How good are scopes as lenses?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-01-06, 00:10
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default How good are scopes as lenses?

As the title says.

I have a Leica APO 77 scope and a D70. If I stuck a Leica camera adaptor on the scopes and took photos with a D70 or better, how good would the images be compared to a decent prime lens?

Let's assume that I've solved the vibration issues, so it's just the lens quality that is the deciding factor. I believe th camera adaptor doubles the lens focal length. So assuming the scope is ~F5, this means that with the camera adaptor the resulting focal length is ~800mm.

I assume that the quality would not be that good as no-one seems to use a scope in this manner. Or maybe it's the shutter vibration and slow F number that turns people off?

Leif
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-06, 00:49
Andy's Avatar
Andy Andy is offline  
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,273
Default

It's a method that produces respectable results (and was a standard method for many in the 80's and 90's) , but this is turning the scope into an f10 800mm lens and that's awfully restrictive light-wise. the view in the camera viewfinder will be very dark indeed with a dslr like the d70... on a dull day, almost too dark to ascertain focus.

With my old 35mm bodies and a 77mm Kowa scope, ASA800 was the norm for anything like a sensible shutter speed.

As I said, results were quite good, slightly softer and less contrast than a genuine lens but certainly ok for a 10x8 print... I still wouldn't go much more than saying it's a birder's method for 'record shots', a Sigma 50-500mm would be better by a margin (and with the luxury of AF)

cheers,
Andy


Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif
As the title says.

I have a Leica APO 77 scope and a D70. If I stuck a Leica camera adaptor on the scopes and took photos with a D70 or better, how good would the images be compared to a decent prime lens?

Let's assume that I've solved the vibration issues, so it's just the lens quality that is the deciding factor. I believe th camera adaptor doubles the lens focal length. So assuming the scope is ~F5, this means that with the camera adaptor the resulting focal length is ~800mm.

I assume that the quality would not be that good as no-one seems to use a scope in this manner. Or maybe it's the shutter vibration and slow F number that turns people off?

Leif
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-06, 09:08
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 8,486
Default

Hi Leif,

Nothing to add to Andy's comments, just posting to say welcome to WPF, nice to have you aboard.

Duncan.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-06, 09:31
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 48
Posts: 1,856
Default

Having tried using scopes as a lens with both the APO77 and the AT80HD I would not recommend it.

Main problems I found were:
1. light gathering - poor light gathering means slow shutter speeds, which makes shake and bird movement a big issue.
2. lack of metering - this can cause exposure issues (though not so bad with digital were trial and error is easy) I found I normally ended up under expossing to push the shutter speeds up.
3. time consuming system - it takes time to remove the camera lens and scope eyepeice and attach it all together. This is far from ideal if you plan to combine birding and photography.

That said in good light it is possible to get good shots (though I always found them to be a bit soft). If you already have a scope and a DSLR then this is cheaper than buying a long lens, and will give higher mag. However a lens such as the Sigma 170-500 wouldn't cost too much more, will alllow AF and give better and more consistant results.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-06, 09:33
postcardcv's Avatar
postcardcv postcardcv is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 48
Posts: 1,856
Default

opps - should also have mentioned that putting an slr on the back of a scope will make it very tail heavy, so a good tripod head becomes even for essential.

I'd also say that in my experience digiscoing with a compact digi camera has been easier and given better results.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-06, 10:41
Adey Baker's Avatar
Adey Baker Adey Baker is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hinckley, Leics., UK
Posts: 965
Default

Check out Faisca Sparky's gallery on Birdforum to see what can be done in the bright light of Portugal with a 350D and Zeiss85/camera adaptor.

I took about 100 shots of Lesser Spotted Woodpecker last year with an angled Leica/photo adaptor and Canon 20D and none of them was up to much! Admittedly it was not an ideal situation and, as mentioned by postcardcv above, my tripod head could have done with being a bit more substantial, but I thought at least one or two would have been OK. There was also some noticeable blue fringing around the areas of black against white in the bird's plumage.

The Leica adaptor screws around the outside of the eyepiece mount via a very fine thread which has to be lined-up perfectly to engage and can be a bit of a nuisance, especially in very cold weather.
__________________
Adey

http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805

'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-06, 18:27
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

Marvelous! Thanks everyone for your informative answers. I knew this would be the place to ask.

Leif
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:21.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.