Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
Lenses Discussion of Lenses |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Lens Hoods (and now filters)- How important are they?
I read elsewhere that someone had been using a Canon 400mm DO f4 lens without a hood for some time. I have to say I was a bit shocked.
What do you think about the value of hoods? I think with small prime lenses you can often do without one, but something with a lot of glass (big zooms, fast primes) surely need some form of cover protecting stray light bouncing around. Besides, they provide great protection for the glassware.
__________________
Digiscoped.Com - Bird Photography Andy Bright.Com - Laughable Aviation Photography |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Small primes are simple in design and utilise few lens elements. Physically longer lenses contain more elements that are are more prone to flare, requiring a hood to shade from stray light. Personally I use a lens hood to shelter the front element from dust and other contaminants. A lens hood will also protect a lens from physical damage stopping a user from bumping it into things!
__________________
http://www.aviation-photography.co.uk/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I have to agree that the best function of a lens hood is to protect the glass against the elements,dust and damage. I used a sigma 170-500mm lens without a hood for over 2 months and never noticed any difference where stray light was concerned.
__________________
http://www.psiloswildlifephotography.co.uk |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Personally I would not consider using a lens without a lens hood. Probably the only time you could safely do that is when there is NO possibility of stray light striking the front element.
Don |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
http://www.aviation-photography.co.uk/ |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The best hood I had was for my Bronica. It was a bellows type and could be racked in or out to suit whatever lens with great precision. Don |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Never shoot without one except in extreme close-up.
nirofo. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Since it has been suggested that we all remove our filters,then using the lens hood is a must!!!
__________________
Christine Avatar by Tracker(tom) [COLOR="Blue http://www.haverigg.com http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/sho...00/ppuser/2356 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Why would we all want to remove our filters, I always have one of some description fitted on the lens, even if it's just a UV to protect the front element. The only time I don't use a front element filter is when using my Nikkor 500mm f4 (125mm front element), it has a built in protective glass front element. Also when using a macro lens with a deeply recessed front element, as in Tamron 90mm macro.
nirofo. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't dream of not using some type of filter for the front of my lens. Between smoke, dust and unintentional scratches, it is much cheaper replacing a filter than it is a lens.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|