WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Cameras


Cameras Discussion on Cameras of all types

low light? canon v nikon

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-10-07, 20:10
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Hi Don, my comment about Andy Rouse, whilst true, was put in tongue in cheek for a bit of fun. His criteria is obviously wildlife photography so presumably follow focus among others. Robs comments on focusing on the mug agree with my comments about working around problems by using the single central focusing point and finding an edge for greater contrast. Given two lenses of the same 'speed' and focal length one sometimes seems to focus better than the other which I have always put down to one lens having better contrast than the other. Any thoughts on that?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-10-07, 01:31
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoll View Post
How did you have your camera set up? Centre focus only is far better in poor light as more sensitive than the other focus points. I find it varies depending on which lens is attached as well even if they have the same f-stop with one hunting and the other locking on easily. Also your mate may have been using the old trick of focussing on something near the subject with better contrast, say the edge of a tree trunk next to the stag or on the antlers rather than the main body of the animal. Nikon better than Canon at focussing? No way . Andy Rouse chose Canon because of the better focussing!

Things have moved on a ways since then, Nikon focussing is a different beast now - eat your heart out Andy Rouse!

nirofo.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-10-07, 11:49
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoll View Post
Given two lenses of the same 'speed' and focal length one sometimes seems to focus better than the other which I have always put down to one lens having better contrast than the other. Any thoughts on that?

Mike,
I do not have two similar A/F lenses to check out the lens resolution bit but I guess when you reach the boundarys everything counts.
So I have just looked at Photozone reviews of the Sigma and Tamron to look at the MTF charts and the Tamron has it by a nose.
Now going back through the thread to crazee horse second post and he says " we both put the cameras on auto and then program and focused on the same thing. ". In this case that may also have relavence. What auto/program mode was used ? From my experience of the 350D then if it is on basic program ALL A/F points are live just the same as the D50. In this case his friend may have set Vari program on the D50 and that would allow him to set a single central A/F point.

From a specs point of view ( DPR ) the 350D A/F range is EV -0.5 to + 18, D50 range EV -1.0 to + 19 so the D50 has it by 0.5 EV
Lenses from photozone MTF at 300mm, Sigma on the 350D MTF centre 1676 edge 955, Tamron on the D50 centre 1849 edge 1489. Advantage the Tamron on the D50

The unknown is then selected focal length. As these are both variable aperture lenses if the guy with the D50 was at less than 300mm and crazee horse at 300mm then it would be advantage D50. Could have been f5.6 on the 350D and say f5.25 on the D50.

Hardly scientific, but add all these factors up and the result would be as described.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-10-07, 13:49
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

Some info from a Canon write up on AF

"The camera's AF sensors require some details in the image to determine the phase difference. It's harder for the camera to find focus when the light is dim or there is little subject detail. Contrary to recent remarks on another topic, the camera CAN distinguish contrast between equally bright hues of red and green just as the eye can--the sensors are color corrected. Although the sensors can distinguish some quite subtle detail differences, they don't see quite a sharply as the eye. If the lens starts from a very out of focus condition, it can miss very fine detail that the eye sees clearly, such as the mesh of a speaker grill from across the room. In this case, it can be helped if the photographer manually moves close to "focus" and allows the camera to find the actual focus."
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-10-07, 17:13
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirofo View Post
Things have moved on a ways since then, Nikon focussing is a different beast now - eat your heart out Andy Rouse!

nirofo.
Well Andy Rouse buys and pays for his own gear (much to his annoyance- he feels Canon should do a deal with him) so if he feels Nikon are that much better and would get him shots he would otherwise miss I guess he would jump brands. Then of course it would all change around again at some point!
Don , interesting answer to my question. I don't pretend to understand MTF charts etc but it certainly shows there is a lot more to it than simply pointing two cameras at the same subject to see which is better! My bother-in-law
went out the other morning with his 400D and at 6.30am in woodland in very poor light got his photos of deer with no problems.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-10-07, 20:06
Chris W Chris W is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7
Default

Forget low light, try focusing on fog, or a clear blue sky, my D400 does, my mates Nikon............um.............dosen't!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-10-07, 20:40
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miketoll View Post
.............. but it certainly shows there is a lot more to it than simply pointing two cameras at the same subject to see which is better!


Better is what you decided to buy for whatever reason. Just enjoy using it.

While taking pics for a thread today I thought of watches as an analogy. Some people have a Rolex, I have a Seiko. Mine might not maintain time to a nano second but it does for me.

For Rolex owners then I can understand why you have one. I bought a F2's because I appreciated the mechanical precision but I took no better pics with them than I did the relatively lowly FM's that I traded in to get them. Just enjoyed using them more.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-10-07, 20:45
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris W View Post
Forget low light, try focusing on fog, or a clear blue sky, my D400 does, my mates Nikon............um.............dosen't!
Trying to understand the motivation behind that one.

I think I'll pass unless checking sensor for dustbunnies.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-10-07, 21:00
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Hoey View Post
Trying to understand the motivation behind that one.
Don
Well I guess this is where we first came in, playing with some one elses camera for fun and curiosity. As you say Don I just enjoy taking photos and also just playing with cameras (sad I know). I have a niece who is a psychologist but I daren't tell her!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-10-07, 07:59
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 8,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Hoey View Post
Better is what you decided to buy for whatever reason. Just enjoy using it.
Best statement in this thread so far.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Hoey View Post
While taking pics for a thread today I thought of watches as an analogy. Some people have a Rolex, I have a Seiko. Mine might not maintain time to a nano second but it does for me.

For Rolex owners then I can understand why you have one. I bought a F2's because I appreciated the mechanical precision but I took no better pics with them than I did the relatively lowly FM's that I traded in to get them. Just enjoyed using them more.

Don
I bet you the Seiko will keep better time than the Rolex.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.