WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Tandem teleconverters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 19-11-08, 20:32
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,488
Default

Well, out of curiosity, I tried stacked 1.4 converters with my 400 DO lens. With one converter it is great but with two it was rubbish. Glad it was only an experiment and not shooting anything important!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-11-08, 12:22
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 1,586
Default

I use the Tamron SP 1.4x converter....which I believe is essencially the same thing as the Kenko pro series one. The 2x on the other hand produces very mixed results.
Intended primarily for use with my 300mm 2.8, I would be interested to know whether going for another 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6x unit and fastening to the 300mm +1.4x combination is going to be a more successful set up.......otherwise it could be more favourable to go with something like a TC301 2x converter.?
AF is nice, but is rubbishy slow with the tamron 2x (tho still reasonably quick with 1.4x), so MF isn't such a major chore.

any thoughts/findings?
__________________
primarily using Nikon film and digi kit, and some micro 4/3rds gear for experimenting with old lenses
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-11-08, 13:17
Snowyowl's Avatar
Snowyowl Snowyowl is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada & Ocala National Forest, Florida, USA
Age: 84
Posts: 1,685
Default

Most things that I have read say that 2X converters don't really do a very good job, at least on Canon. There has been quite a lot to comment on the Canon site at differnt times and the consensus seems to be use no greater than a 1.5X. I'm talking only about single teleconverters not stacked.
__________________
Dan
http://snowyowl.smugmug.com/Nature
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-11-08, 19:52
Joe's Avatar
Joe Joe is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 1,586
Default

Yes, 2x seems poor, but my point is, are two stacked 1.4x converters a better idea than using one 2x converter. Theories of more glass elements seem to contradict themselves.
Is it the lesser of the two evils? assuming that by using one 1.4x converter isn't enough?
__________________
primarily using Nikon film and digi kit, and some micro 4/3rds gear for experimenting with old lenses
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22-11-08, 09:48
Roy C's Avatar
Roy C Roy C is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Barnstaple, North Devon
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
Yes, 2x seems poor, but my point is, are two stacked 1.4x converters a better idea than using one 2x converter. Theories of more glass elements seem to contradict themselves.
Is it the lesser of the two evils? assuming that by using one 1.4x converter isn't enough?
As already stated, I have tried stacked 1.4's v 2x a few times and there is nothing in it IMO in fact if anything the stacked tc faired slightly better IQ wise. Not that I am saying that either combo is a good solution in the field.

I did see a thread once that quoted distortion figures for a 1.4 tc and a 2x tc and according to the figures stacked 1.4's should show less distortion.

What I always find with converters on my 400mm f5.6 is that they perform very well if you are close to your subject (even with stacked 1.4 and 2x, see my earlier post) but lack detail for a distance subject which kind of defeats the object for me.
__________________
Roy

MY WEB SITE
MY PHOTOSTREAM
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.