WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Sigma 18-125mm 3.5 - 5.6

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 28-10-06, 19:45
Horace's Avatar
Horace Horace is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern England
Posts: 314
Default Sigma 18-125mm 3.5 - 5.6

I am thinking of buying this Sigma zoom.Does anyone own one and what do they think of it.They sales guy in Jessops today advised me it was just as good as the Nikon 18-135mm.He suggested I save myself some money and get the Sigma !!!!!!
Any comments please.
Horace
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-10-06, 19:51
Canis Vulpes's Avatar
Canis Vulpes Canis Vulpes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 4,398
Default

Be wary of sales advisors, it might be the Sigma carries more margin then the Nikkor which means more commission for them. I would search the web for reviews and make the decision myself. Take your time but with lenses you really do get what you pay for.

Could you borrow one from Jessops and decide after say, a week?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-10-06, 20:59
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

A review of the lens

http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/len...3556/index.htm

As Stephen has said I would take your camera in and take some test shots and examine at home before buying. (especially at the long and wide ends of zoom - include a door frame in the shot to check for degree of barrel & pincushion distortion)

Out of the 30 or so members of Jessops staff I've dealt with over the years I would say that only 2 of them were photographers and actually knew what they were talking about.

In recent years Sigma have pulled their finger out on the EX range but the cheap range mainly suffer from slow AF and poor build quality.

Personally I would question the logic of putting a x7 or x10 zoom on a DSLR. You can pay a high price in terms of image quality and distortion to get a wide zoom range. But if you must have a wide zoom range so be it.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated

Last edited by robski; 28-10-06 at 21:37.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-10-06, 21:10
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace View Post
They sales guy in Jessops today advised me it was just as good as the Nikon 18-135mm.He suggested I save myself some money and get the Sigma !!!!!!
Any comments please.
Horace
Horace,

I would suggest taking your camera to the shop and asking if you can take sample pics with each lens from the doorway.

One at 18mm another at 50mm and lastly at 135mm.

As this will include buildings, signs etc you could compare them at home on your PC. Check for barrel and pincushion distortion, and general sharpness.

If the sales guy is so confident he should not have a problem with that.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-10-06, 09:06
Horace's Avatar
Horace Horace is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern England
Posts: 314
Default

Thankyou gentleman for taking the time to reply.I have found a site that reviews Nikon lens that maybe of interest to other users of the Forum.
www.kenrockwell.com/nikon
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-10-06, 11:32
Tannin's Avatar
Tannin Tannin is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 288
Default

Ken Rockwell does more than just Nikon, but be warned, the general consensus is that his stuff is very lightweight and he lacks credibility. Worth a visit, sure, but there are other places that you would take a lot more seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-10-06, 11:52
Canis Vulpes's Avatar
Canis Vulpes Canis Vulpes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 4,398
Default

Here is one of the most respected Nikon reviewers, Bjorn Roslett.

http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_surv.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-10-06, 17:44
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

I've edited Tannin's post slightly to tease out the relevant information a little more clearly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tannin View Post
Ken Rockwell ..........[snip].............. lacks credibility.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.