WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Off Topic > Computers and The Internet


Computers and The Internet This is the place to ask questions and discuss the complex world of computer and internet issues.

Build your own PC

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-01-09, 19:38
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default Build your own PC

Back in early 2006 I upgraded my pc based on a component list that Nirofo shared in post 15 in this thread using some of my existing components but taking that processor & motherboard as a starting point, and I've since upgraded to 2Gb RAM

It has served me well but me thinks nearly 3 years on that the time has come to move on again so what would anyone's current recommendations be without spending the preverbial arm & leg. I'm not planning on running Vista (pah) so

AMD or Intel processors?
Dual core or more?
What motherboard?
Graphics card?
etc?

My main "power" applications are Photoshop (of course), Lightroom (which can be slow in version 2.1 using the new gradient filters & adjustment brushes) & Video Studio 12 which takes a loooooong time re-rendering even short videos
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-09, 19:45
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 8,486
Default

I used to build all my own PCs for many years. These days I find it's more cost effective to buy a ready-built Dell. I can get a complete machine for typically less money than the bits I need to buy to do an upgrade. Dells aren't the most rip-snorting machines, but they do everything perfectly adequately well, offering very good value for money.

Have a look on the factory outlet site for base unit only deals, as you presumably don't need monitor/KB/mouse. There's some bargains to be had if you look hard enough.
http://www1.euro.dell.com/content/de...=uk&l=en&s=dfo

Vista is much better since SP1 came out, haven't had any issues with it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-09, 21:50
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Both my sons built their own machines after careful consideration of components but say that they did not really save any money but have satisfaction and the exact machine they wanted. To get the best 'bang for your buck' and make no mistakes on the hardware side takes a good working knowledge of an ever changing market. They both have this but I would not have a clue so would just buy off the shelf. Hope you enjoy it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-09, 02:06
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

Hi Gidders

Pleased to hear you built your current PC based on the components I reccommended to you, here's an updated list of good components that won't cost you the earth but will give you a large improvement over the one you're using now. The spec is similar to the PC I'm using at the moment, it handles Photoshop CS4, Nikon Capture NX 2.1 and Lightroom 2 with no trouble at all and is very quick, in fact I'm able to have all 3 open together if I need to. Although Win XP doesn't recognise the 4.0Gb of Ram, Photoshop etc, is still able to make use of it and your computer runs faster than if you only had 3Gb.

All the best.

nirofo.

See EBuyer list with quick find codes below.

http://orders.ebuyer.com/customer/shopping/index.html?action=c2hvd2NhcnQ%3D


OCZ 2GB Kit (2x1GB) DDR2 800MHz/PC2-6400 CL 4-4-4-15 PLATINUM XTC with LIFETIME WARRANTY.
Quick find code: 116755. £23.57 ea 2 off (4.0Gb). £47.14


ASUS M3N78 SE nForce720D Socket AM2+ 6 channel audio ATX Motherboard.
Quick find code: 152578. £54.95


AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000 3.1GHz Socket AM2 1MB L2 (2x512KB) Cache Retail Boxed Processor.
Quick find code: 149211. £67.81


Sapphire HD 3650 512MB GDDR3 Dual DVI TV Out PCI-E Graphics Card.
Quick find code: 140585. £56.65


Western Digital WD5000AAKS 500GB SATA II 7200RPM 16MB Cache - OEM.
Quick find code: 124228 £51.62ea. 2off. £103.23


LiteOn 20X SATA DVD1RW/RAM Black, Beige & Silver Bezels, Nero & Power DVD – Retail.
Quick find code: 149314. £18.43

Total Inc VAT: £348.20
Shipping Charge: £14.93
TOTAL = £363.13

Last edited by nirofo; 06-01-09 at 02:09.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-09, 10:20
andy153's Avatar
andy153 andy153 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bodelwyddan Denbighshire
Age: 78
Posts: 5,271
Default

Hi there Clive, dare I say it, for about the same money you could get the Mac Mini.
__________________
"I take pictures of what I like - if someone else likes them - that's a bonus" Andy M.

http://www.pbase.com/andy153

http://andy153.smugmug.com/

Equipment: Nikon - More than enough !!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-09, 11:13
Canis Vulpes's Avatar
Canis Vulpes Canis Vulpes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 51
Posts: 4,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andy153 View Post
Hi there Clive, dare I say it, for about the same money you could get the Mac Mini.
Agreed, but the above specification would be similar to high end iMac performance which would not be that cost.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-09, 16:24
Derekb's Avatar
Derekb Derekb is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bradford
Age: 64
Posts: 550
Default

I have built a good few windows PC's (including 64 bit OS with 16Gb of RAM) and also own a (very) high end laptop running Vista with 4 Gb of RAM.

I run Lightroom (V1 & v2) and CS3 on the above and in general I am very unhappy with the performance, especially if you compare it against my iMac below.

I bought the 24" iMac last year, primarily for my photography work as graphic designer friends were telling me how much better they worked with Photoshop et al. I have to agree, there is just no comparison and I personally think it's down to Windows not handling the software as well, whatever the hardware you use.

OK the Mac's are more expensive, but no way do you get the same performance even if you spend the same money on PC's and Windows (I have tried for clients).

If you don't beleive me then try the following: open 100 x 1 Mb jpegs in Photoshop on your PC (if it will let you) and batch process them - say do a 50% crop. Your PC will likely crash - if it doesn't then open 200 images and repeat. The Mac will do this with ease.

OK not a real world example, but I'm trying to show how much better a Mac handles the processing of images. I actually don't know what the maximum number is before the Mac will throw up its hands - but I have batch processsed over 600 images.

I will not buy another PC, but instead buy Mac's and run windows on them if I need to.
__________________
My Website

My New Website
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-03-09, 18:24
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

Hi Gidders

Did you ever manage to upgrade your computer, if you did what spec did you eventually end up with ?

nirofo.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-03-09, 16:54
Gidders's Avatar
Gidders Gidders is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nirofo View Post
Hi Gidders

Did you ever manage to upgrade your computer, if you did what spec did you eventually end up with ?

nirofo.
No - I've recently bought a Canon 40D partly because if does do some things better my 20D and partly because I'm doing a few commercial shoots and felt I needed a spare body just in case.

I chose this over the 50D because
a) the were mixed write ups over the 50D particularly at high ISO performance levels &
b) as it was "only" 10Mp my existing PC set up can handle that were as moving to the 15Mp 50D would have definitely need a PC upgrade as well as the camera upgrade and my wallet said "ouch"
__________________
Clive
http://www.alteredimages.uk.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-05-09, 14:47
randiman randiman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: matale
Posts: 5
Default

you need to know exactly where to fix in your parts else you might be losing both you time and money
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.