WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Equipment > Lenses


Lenses Discussion of Lenses

Sigma 50-500 or Tamron 200-500

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-10-06, 20:06
Michael Hogan's Avatar
Michael Hogan Michael Hogan is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wicklow, Ireland
Posts: 43
Default Sigma 50-500 or Tamron 200-500

I have just rekindled my love for birdwatching and photography and want to combine both. I have just bought a Nikon D80 (just love it - was using a Panasonic FZ30 and the difference is staggering). It came with a 18-135 lens that is great for general stuff but I need a long lens for the wildlife. Would love to be able to afford a Nikon prime but way too expensive. I had thought about the new Nikon 80-400 VR but 400 is not long enough and from what Nikon tell me it will not take a teleconvertor.
It seems from what I read that for value for money the two lenses are the Sigma 50-500 and the Tamron 200-500. Which would you recommend.

Also what is the best teleconvertor to go with them

Thanks in advance

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-06, 21:39
Christine's Avatar
Christine Christine is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Haverigg,South Lakes,Cumbria.Uk
Posts: 3,828
Default

Michael,cannot speak from personal use(I use Canon),but on BF there are many users of the Sigma 50-500.I have seen some superb shots obtained from this lens.But if weight is a problem ,I do believe the Tamron could be lighter.I use a Tamron 28-300 for general use,and it is a great little lens.
also I have seen some superb images taken using the Tamron 200-500.If you have time to spare,why not pop over to www.birdforum.net the sister site to WPF,and go to the gallery,type the lens into the search bar,and you will see shots taken by the lenses.
__________________
Christine
Avatar by Tracker(tom)
[COLOR="Blue

http://www.haverigg.com

http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/sho...00/ppuser/2356
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-06, 23:26
ollieholmes's Avatar
ollieholmes ollieholmes is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shefford, Bedfordshire
Age: 37
Posts: 803
Default

I agree with Chrisitines comments about the 28-300. It is not my airshow lens and it has given me some great photos.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-10-06, 00:29
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

The Tamron 200-500 is a superb lens, I have seen many excellent photo's produced with this lens in both film and digital, in my opinion it knocks the spots off the Bigma!

Incidentally, it can be purchased from Essential Systems in Germany for 793 EURO (£535.60 at today's rate) including vat and carriage. Details at the following web address.

http://www.essential-systems.de/index.php

The Tamron 200-500 works well with a 1.4 Kenco Pro or a Tamron 1.4 teleconverter, I think they're both the same converter with different names! Can't vouch for the Bigma, but doubt it would be very good at the short end of the zoom range.

nirofo.

Last edited by nirofo; 13-10-06 at 00:37.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-10-06, 16:32
KC Foggin's Avatar
KC Foggin KC Foggin is offline  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 691
Default

I've just received my Tamron 200-500 and all indications are that I will love it once I get used to the weight. Faster focusing than the Sigma but I know I will need a lot of practice with it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-10-06, 20:33
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Recommend the Kenko 1.4 Pro. Took some shots today with it on the Canon 70-300 DO IS and its given some really sharp shots. Don't think its the same as the Tamron, not the Pro anyway as has more elements in its construction.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-07-07, 22:50
Gary Shilton Gary Shilton is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 10
Default

I was led to believe converter's of 'ANY' kind are useless on the Tamron....
Even the company say not to use a converter with this lens.
But I stand to be corrected.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-07-07, 22:56
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

Works great on my Tamron 200-500.

nirofo.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-07-07, 23:01
Gary Shilton Gary Shilton is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 10
Default

Which converter do you have?.......(got me curious)
Which would you recommend for the D70s that my Tamron is on?

Many Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-07-07, 10:03
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 59
Posts: 8,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Shilton View Post
Which converter do you have?.......(got me curious)
See niriofo's post number #4 above.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.