WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > General Photography > The Photography Forum


The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion.

landscape photography problems.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-04-10, 08:35
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 1,782
Default landscape photography problems.

I have recently been trying to take some landscape pictures, but can;t seem to get the image totally sharp throughout the picture.

I have tried using small apertures like F16 up to F22 and been told to focus 2 3rds into the image and fire with a remote. The camera is mounted on a tripod. I have been doing this but the background of the image is always pretty soft. do i need to focus to infinity or is there something im doing wrong.

Please help.....

Oh the equipment is a nikon d60 with sigma 18mm-200 non IS

regards lee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-04-10, 08:51
gordon g gordon g is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,766
Default

Use mirror lock-up if you can. Check DOF on depth of field preview if your camera has it. Also, search on-line for details of hyperfocal focussing techniques, this will probably make the biggest difference.
Another factor is using too small an apeture, which increases overall DOF, but also decreases overall sharpness as you begin to suffer from interference from diffraction. (Again - search on sites such as luminous landscape for technical details.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-10, 09:13
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 1,782
Default

Thanks for the reply. i will look into hyperfocal now....cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-10, 09:24
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 1,782
Default

ok found this very useful......

http://www.barbeephoto.com/articles/...hyperfocal.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-10, 11:14
graham harcombe's Avatar
graham harcombe graham harcombe is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gosforth, Cumbria UK
Age: 78
Posts: 7,340
Default

There's a lot of good reading there, thanks Lee.

Graham
__________________
http://www.ellida-of-laira.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-10, 14:06
Peter Waites's Avatar
Peter Waites Peter Waites is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 7,264
Default

That's as good as I've seen on the subject Lee. Thanks for sharing it. Now don't we wish for a DoF preview on the D60?
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-10, 00:21
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 1,782
Default

Thats true....but i think we can get by without it. I think it would be easier if the lens had the hyperfocal focusing marks on the barrel. Focusing 1 1/3 into the image seems to be a little hit and miss.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-04-10, 11:30
andy153's Avatar
andy153 andy153 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bodelwyddan Denbighshire
Age: 78
Posts: 5,271
Default

Excellent info Lee, Thanks - I use Expoaperture2 discs.
__________________
"I take pictures of what I like - if someone else likes them - that's a bonus" Andy M.

http://www.pbase.com/andy153

http://andy153.smugmug.com/

Equipment: Nikon - More than enough !!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-10, 12:15
prostie1200 prostie1200 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hampshire uk
Age: 88
Posts: 1,325
Default

Hi Lee


Appreciate your dilema, but feel that part of you problrm is due to your lens.

The 18-200 is a good walk about tool, but for highly defined landscape photographs prime lenses are more suitable, say 35mm D or the 50mm 1.8D.
I know useing these lenses means more work in positioning yourself to frame the picture you desire, but the result will be much more satisfying.

I shoot Nikon and for landscape shots use Apature priority and Matrix metering, it may also help to dial in some negative ev to avoid birning out the highlights.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-04-10, 16:50
surfg1mp's Avatar
surfg1mp surfg1mp is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abingdon, Oxford, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 1,782
Default

Thanks for the advice guys what are expo discs andy?

Im saving at the moment for the af-s nikon micro 60mm, not for this reason as its mainly for prtrait and macro, but being as you've said a prime lens will do better for lanscapes ill try it on that too....although it maybe a little long on a cropped sensor...! will find out huh.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.