WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > Macro Photography Technique


Macro Photography Technique Discussions on Macro Photography

Which Macro Lens?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 26-02-09, 23:49
weeds weeds is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default Which Macro Lens?

Hi All,

In have recently discovered the world of macro photography and I am looking at purchasing my first macro lens. I have a D90 and am looking at the Nikkor Micro 60mm f2.8, Nikkor Micro 105mm f2.8 or the Tamron 90mm macro lens.

Can anyone help with me with choosing the best lens. I want to take photos of all things small not just one particular item.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-09, 23:57
blackmarlin's Avatar
blackmarlin blackmarlin is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oakmere. Northwich, Cheshire.
Posts: 873
Default

Try the Sigma 105mm macro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-02-09, 00:08
weeds weeds is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default

How does the Sigma 105mm compare to the Nikkor lenses? I don't mind spending the extra money on a better lens.

Is it better to ge the longer focal length lens?

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-02-09, 01:55
blackmarlin's Avatar
blackmarlin blackmarlin is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oakmere. Northwich, Cheshire.
Posts: 873
Default

It compares very well, in fact I own one. You really need one with a longer focal length. The sigma scores on being in the same class as the 105mm Nikor but is considerably cheaper, Whatever you do though don't buy one with a short focal length just because it is cheaper, they can make it difficult to get close to your subject.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-02-09, 03:22
weeds weeds is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Default

Great and thanks again. I'll see if any of my local camera stores carry the Sigma 105mm in stock. Lens prices here in Oz are going up by around 20% so its advantageous to buy what the retailer has in stock instead of ordering one in.

Weeds.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-02-09, 07:07
andy153's Avatar
andy153 andy153 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bodelwyddan Denbighshire
Age: 78
Posts: 5,271
Default

Hi there, I have the 105mm micro Nikkor and the 70-180 Micro Nikkor, which I use in conjunction with screw in close-up filters. I would recommend either. If you are using a tripod you do not need the VR function so a second hand older 105 will do very well. Both these lenses have the advantage of enabling you to stand off from the subject so you do not disturb it. The zoom micro enables you to focus and then frame. If you can afford it, go for Nikkor lenses every time - it's the best long term investment.
__________________
"I take pictures of what I like - if someone else likes them - that's a bonus" Andy M.

http://www.pbase.com/andy153

http://andy153.smugmug.com/

Equipment: Nikon - More than enough !!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-02-09, 07:31
Adey Baker's Avatar
Adey Baker Adey Baker is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hinckley, Leics., UK
Posts: 965
Default

I suppose it depends on what you mean by the 'world of macro photography.' Static 'still-life' or wildlife, etc? Macro means large and usually refers to life-size or greater (at the film-plane in the camera) but in general use means close-up. Many wildlife subjects, such as butterflies, dragonflies, etc., don't need the closest focus distance on the lens but do benefit from the optical corrections designed into macro lenses. All of the lenses you've mentioned are fine as far as quality of the image goes.
__________________
Adey

http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805

'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-02-09, 08:33
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

Any of the lenses you shortlisted will give good image quality. I use the Sigma 105 and am very happy with it. As Adey says, a lot depends on what you want to do with your lens. You are in the best position to decide which is hte best for you.

As you say, there's a cost benefit in buying something that's in stock, so go into shops and try lenses. Pick the one that you are happiest with.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-02-09, 17:26
Rudra Sen Rudra Sen is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 2,632
Default

A block macro lens with long focal length is a good investment.
Let me throw a stone at hornets nest...why not a 200mm macro?

You'll struggle less to get a good shot for sure.

Last edited by Rudra Sen; 27-02-09 at 17:28.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-09, 21:52
walwyn's Avatar
walwyn walwyn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Warwickshire
Age: 68
Posts: 1,066
Default

If you already have a zoom lens why not try a Raynox DCR-250 at £35?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.