WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > Macro Photography Technique


Macro Photography Technique Discussions on Macro Photography

Manual macro on the cheap.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #61  
Old 04-06-07, 23:07
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphire View Post
.........it is just lit with the sunlight,
Well there you go Christine. That level of magnification at 1/320 sec, hand held . I could not do that in a milliion years. I would need to look at the prog that Chris has posted in the Darkroom thread.

Very neat idea re the lighting though.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-06-07, 16:57
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

I found this spider lurking in the corner of the workshop lean-to. A example of were there is no possibility of using a tripod. In fact even getting a reasonable angle that allowed viewing in the vewfinder was a problem. To give some sense of scale, the spiders egg ball is about 6mm in diameter.

I decided to give the D100 and pop-up flash a go.

Pic 1 ( full frame ) is with reversed 24mm at f16
Pic 2 ( full frame ) with Kenko 1.4tc and reversed 24mm at f16
Pic 3 shows kitchen towel used as pop-up flash diffuser. PK12 tube is on the end of the 24mm to act as a lens hood.
Pic 4 ( full frame ) D2X, standard 105mm, plus PK-12, PK-13 extension tubes plus bellows. ( Total 170mm extension ).

Don
Attached Images
File Type: jpg D100 plus rev 24mm.jpg (171.1 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg D100 plus rev24-plus-tc.jpg (171.4 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg D100-setup.jpg (146.2 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg D2X-_105-pus-170mm-extensio.jpg (161.2 KB, 16 views)
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-06-07, 18:14
Saphire's Avatar
Saphire Saphire is offline  
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Shropshire
Age: 75
Posts: 5,980
Default

Wow! Don, a fantastic set of photos, the DOF is short but they are so crisp.
You wouldn't catch me that close to a spider of that size I would have to be at least 3feet away if not more. That egg sack is huge how does it feed or get around.
__________________
Christine Iwancz
Gallery upload limit is 4 photos per 24hrs Gallery Posting Guidelines here
http://ciphotography.freehostia.com/index.php
Equipment= Canon 7D, 40D, 400 f5.6, 75-300, 100mm Macro, 18-55, Canon 70-200 f4, Tokina 12-24mm, Kenko pro 300 1.4,1.5 and 2.0x, Jessops ext tube set,
Canon 580 flash. Home made ring flash. . Close-lens.


Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-06-07, 18:41
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

2nd of the set is superb Don. Real nightmare stuff if you look deep into its eyes!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-06-07, 19:09
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

In case you are interested, that is a female Nursery Web Spider, also known as a Wolf Spider. I find them rather cute!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-06-07, 19:57
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Hoey View Post
If you are able to reverse a 28mm then forget the tubes and just use that. All you now require is a diffusion panel taped above the lens and you can use the D200 pop-up. It will be good for around f16 at ISO200/400.
I was suggesting tubes + reversed lens to get a range of magnifications. I was able to get about 4x with a tube, the 28mm lens on its own giving about 2x I believe.

All this talk of home made diffusers, soft boxes and ring flashes has got me wondering what I can knock up. The only problem is making something rugged enough to carry several miles cross country in a backpack.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-06-07, 21:41
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Here is a link to various magnification ratio's. OK its a Nikon link but then knowing me it has to be. http://www.nikonlinks.com/unklbil/macro_adapter.htm


Leif,

Lack of dof really starts to become an issue even with a reversed 24. Although adding a tc or tubes will increase magnification pic 2 of the spider set shows how much dof has been lost in the process. I think this is where sensor resolution becomes a serious asset as it allows for a fair crop of an image at lower magnification.

Too windy to play outdoors today but I am still searching for the best compromise. Wish I had the reach of a 105 in a macro lens now.

For backpacking and only using the D200 pop-up then a few sheets of kitchen roll and a bit of masking tape is probably as rugged and small as you'll get. As the dragonfly/fungii master with macro as your primary tool, then if I was in your position there would be only one route I would go, and that is a proper job.

Nikon SB-R1 Close Up Remote Kit or Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Light Flash.

The Nikon unit being the more versatile of the two, and you can add additional flash units at a later date. i-TTL so no flash knowledge or calculations required.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-06-07, 21:47
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saphire View Post
You wouldn't catch me that close to a spider of that size I would have to be at least 3feet away if not more. That egg sack is huge how does it feed or get around.
Christine,

If it moves out of the corner so I can get a decent angle on it I will retake on side view at lower magnification as its body really is quite small relative to the egg sack.

I think I need a set up that gives greater lens and therefore finger distance before the large autumn ones appear.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-06-07, 22:13
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Hoey View Post
if I was in your position there would be only one route I would go, and that is a proper job.

Nikon SB-R1 Close Up Remote Kit or Sigma EM-140 DG Ring Light Flash.

The Nikon unit being the more versatile of the two, and you can add additional flash units at a later date. i-TTL so no flash knowledge or calculations required.
Nooo ... my wallet is already starting to give me dirty looks on a regular basis ...

Seriously, I allow myself a limited number of toys per year, and I have pretty much reached this years limit with the 85mm micro.

Regarding limited depth of field, yes I agree that is the killer. I photographed a Nettle Weavil at the weekend, and although I quite liked the image, DOF was not really enough at F22, and diffraction was seriously reducing resolution. It would make a good 6x4" print but no bigger. I am playing with the idea of using that special software to combine multiple images to get increased DOF. I will experiment at the weekend. The issue is whether or not I can get multiple images of a bug in field conditions.

Don't give up on the great outdoors. I use a mini tripod leg attached to a ground spike, and a clamp at the top to steady plants. I've attached a Ladybird Nymph photographed outdoors on a clamped leaf. I was using a macro lens with tubes. And make sure you go out early or late, or on a cool day, when insects are dopey.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg _DSC1020 Ladybird Nymph Frame.jpg (87.2 KB, 11 views)
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-06-07, 22:34
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif View Post
Nooo ... my wallet is already starting to give me dirty looks on a regular basis ...

Seriously, I allow myself a limited number of toys per year, and I have pretty much reached this years limit with the 85mm micro........................................
Don't give up on the great outdoors. I use a mini tripod leg attached to a ground spike, and a clamp at the top to steady plants. I've attached a Ladybird Nymph photographed outdoors on a clamped leaf. I was using a macro lens with tubes. And make sure you go out early or late, or on a cool day, when insects are dopey.
Leif,

Well I am not surprised about the first part as you have the 85 as that is a SERIOUS bit of kit. I will be interested to know how you get on with it. Certainly takes a bit of practice.

As for the pic ......... then to use an expression from Mohamad " you are killing me softly ".

Don
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.