Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion. |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fungi are not plants!
Please can we have a category for Fungi, or rename Plants to Plants and Fungi.
Fungi are not plants. They are in a separate grouping, as are animals. Does anyone care? Maybe not. Except me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I dunno, Princeton University classifies them as "lower plants" ;-)
Rob.
__________________
http://home.btconnect.com/robwatt/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Animals, plants and fungi each have their own separate kingdom: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungi In particular "Fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants". So maybe we should place fungi pictures in the animals section? I think that at the very least the section should be called "Plants and fungi" unless a new section is created. Leif |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If your going to be a Pedant don't be surprised if others resort to pedantry ;-)
The wikipedia is a wiki. Do you understand what that means? It can be edited by anyone and as a result cannot be entirely relied upon. I'll have a search for the Princeton link. I'm pretty certain it was in the top ten hits on my google search. Rob.
__________________
http://home.btconnect.com/robwatt/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Here you go;
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?...ngus%20kingdom The credits at the bottom atribute this to Princeton.
__________________
http://home.btconnect.com/robwatt/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think you meant "you're". I gave that link as an example that you could check. The same information is in the specialist books that I have at home. And at university botanists are taught that Fungi are in a separate kingdom. In any case I checked your link and it too agrees that they are in a separate kingdom. I'm not familiar with the term Lower Plants. As an aside, an organisation recently did a check on wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and found then to be on a par, though neither was free of errors. I find it to be surprisingly accurate on areas about which I am knowledgeable. It seems to be written by people with expert knowledge. Leif |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
n.b. in a belated defence of my poor use of "your" I present; http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=your but thats American so doesn't really count ;-)
__________________
http://home.btconnect.com/robwatt/ Last edited by jammie*dodger; 13-03-06 at 12:49. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|