WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > General Photography > The Photography Forum


The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion.

Fungi are not plants!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-03-06, 18:45
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default Fungi are not plants!

Please can we have a category for Fungi, or rename Plants to Plants and Fungi.

Fungi are not plants. They are in a separate grouping, as are animals. Does anyone care? Maybe not. Except me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-06, 19:48
jammie*dodger jammie*dodger is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 103
Default

I dunno, Princeton University classifies them as "lower plants" ;-)

Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-06, 10:35
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammie*dodger
I dunno, Princeton University classifies them as "lower plants" ;-)

Rob.
Who precisely at Princeton University classifies them as "lower plants"? Are we talking janitor here?

Animals, plants and fungi each have their own separate kingdom:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungi

In particular "Fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants". So maybe we should place fungi pictures in the animals section?

I think that at the very least the section should be called "Plants and fungi" unless a new section is created.

Leif
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-06, 19:38
jammie*dodger jammie*dodger is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 103
Default

If your going to be a Pedant don't be surprised if others resort to pedantry ;-)

The wikipedia is a wiki. Do you understand what that means? It can be edited by anyone and as a result cannot be entirely relied upon. I'll have a search for the Princeton link. I'm pretty certain it was in the top ten hits on my google search.

Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-06, 19:42
jammie*dodger jammie*dodger is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 103
Default

Here you go;

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?...ngus%20kingdom

The credits at the bottom atribute this to Princeton.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-03-06, 07:54
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammie*dodger
If your going to be a Pedant don't be surprised if others resort to pedantry ;-)

The wikipedia is a wiki. Do you understand what that means? It can be edited by anyone and as a result cannot be entirely relied upon. I'll have a search for the Princeton link. I'm pretty certain it was in the top ten hits on my google search.

Rob.
"If your going to be a Pedant don't be surprised if others resort to pedantry"

I think you meant "you're".

I gave that link as an example that you could check. The same information is in the specialist books that I have at home. And at university botanists are taught that Fungi are in a separate kingdom.

In any case I checked your link and it too agrees that they are in a separate kingdom. I'm not familiar with the term Lower Plants.

As an aside, an organisation recently did a check on wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and found then to be on a par, though neither was free of errors. I find it to be surprisingly accurate on areas about which I am knowledgeable. It seems to be written by people with expert knowledge.

Leif
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-03-06, 12:45
jammie*dodger jammie*dodger is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedford, UK
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif
"If your going to be a Pedant don't be surprised if others resort to pedantry"

I think you meant "you're".

<snip>

Leif
Doh! Touche!

n.b. in a belated defence of my poor use of "your" I present;

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=your

but thats American so doesn't really count ;-)

Last edited by jammie*dodger; 13-03-06 at 12:49.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.