WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > General Photography > The Photography Forum


The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion.

How Big of A Difference

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 29-01-06, 06:56
chip's Avatar
chip chip is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Appalachia's U.S.A.
Posts: 5
Default How Big of A Difference

How big of a difference is there between the camera, and an experienced photographer? Does there have to be a good combination of both, to get a good picture?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-01-06, 07:37
Adey Baker's Avatar
Adey Baker Adey Baker is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hinckley, Leics., UK
Posts: 965
Default

Well, it certainly helps to have a camera with which you're familiar and one that you feel comfortable using. Then you can concentrate on taking the photo which should, in theory at least, help to make for the best shot.
__________________
Adey

http://www.birdforum.net/pp_gallery/...00/ppuser/1805

'Write when there is something you know: and not before: and not too damned much after' Ernest Hemingway
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-01-06, 09:52
yelvertoft's Avatar
yelvertoft yelvertoft is offline  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Essex, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 8,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chip
How big of a difference is there between the camera, and an experienced photographer? Does there have to be a good combination of both, to get a good picture?
A bad photographer will take lousy pictures, irrespective of which equipment they are using. A good, experienced photographer will be able to take good photos with the most minimalist equipment under the right conditions. A lot depends on the intended medium of display. If all you do is take pictures for web display or 7"x5" prints to pass around amongst family then you really don't need any high end equipment.

There's far too much emphasis on the minutiae of equipment in most forums. Thankfully WPF seems to be concentrating on composition and general technique which will make far more difference in the long run.

Duncan.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-01-06, 10:14
robski robski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kent UK
Posts: 3,739
Default

I would say it's 80% photographer & 20% camera. On my last business trip to South Korea I took my wife's camera a fuji 5000 instead of my 20D. It's 50 - 50 if I get the chance to take photographs on these trips. You never quiet know where your going to be, if the customer wants to be with you 100% of the time or if there are going to be problems so that you have to work late. The main factor was I did not want to lug the weight. Well I managed to get 3 or 4 hours to myself and at the time wished I had taken the 20D instead for the better quaility image from the 20D resolution and lens. I was using the fuji camera as a point and shoot as I am not used to using it. But having said that I did manage to get some decent shots with the fuji, it is just that I cannot blow the size up as far.
__________________
Rob

-----------------------------------------------------
Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2

Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea.

WPF Gallery
Birdforum Gallery
http://www.robertstocker.co.uk updated
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-01-06, 15:10
Jon Sharp's Avatar
Jon Sharp Jon Sharp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cockermouth, Cumbria
Posts: 319
Default

I think this comes back to that age old question again "What is a good picture?", everyones opinions will differ.

Certainly you may need to understand the basic principles of using the camera and composition but after that it's very much dependant on the subject and who's viewing it.

My avatar was taken using a fuji s7000, a larger version can be seen in my gallery - I like it, I like the detail, the tone and the subject therefore to me it's a good picture, others may quit rightly disagree. However this picture was contrived, I set it up in my back garden and could have been taken on an even less sophisticated camera and still produced a good picture - in my opinion!

In contrast I bought my 14 year old son a digital camera for Christmas - he used it to take a few shots (snaps) of the family and I consider some of them to be good pictures also.
__________________
Jon
www.sharpimagesuk.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-01-06, 23:00
Bob Hastie Bob Hastie is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somerset U.K.
Posts: 87
Default

One of the TV channels here in the UK (BBC2 I think) ran a programme early last year in which they gave professional photographers some very low end cameras, even down to a camera phone, and set them the challenge of using these cameras for a day. Seem to remember they did far better than I could hope to do no matter what equipment I use.
__________________
Bob
http://www.bobhastie.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-01-06, 08:58
greypoint's Avatar
greypoint greypoint is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northants, England
Posts: 2,545
Default

Some of it is down to the subject. A good photographer can take good pictures on the most minimal equipment, of certain subjects [with the proviso of less quality/smaller size of results] - candids, street scenes, landscapes etc.. Try to capture action like sport or wildlife/birds etc. and it becomes harder - yes they'll no doubt find a good interpretation of the theme but without the equipment it will be limited. For most of us it's a case of getting the best equipment we can afford because it makes it easier to photograph what we want - and more fun. The difference being,give a top photographer my budget DSLR/lenses and he/she will come up with top class results. Give me their pro gear and, with a bit of practice, my results should improve a bit but still lack their experience and flair.
The moral is - get the best you can afford for the particular type of photography you aspire to.
__________________
so many swans...so little time

http://www.flickr.com/photos/greypoint/sets/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-01-06, 09:17
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,305
Default

I think Greypoint has the answer. In a nutshell buy the best you can afford in every thing you buy from can opener to car

Ian
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.