WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > Macro Photography Technique


Macro Photography Technique Discussions on Macro Photography

Macro Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 24-12-05, 18:54
Marshall Marshall is offline  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Stretford Mancheste
Posts: 3
Default Macro Lenses

First things first, I am a new member and look forward to learning new things and contributing when my limited experience will allow, so can I just say Halo to you all and Merry Christmas - All the best for the new year to all.

I found this thread indeed this site whiles looking for a macro lens and learn something of the techniques used to obtain good results,
I know the attributes of the 500D and indeed have experimented with this on a number of lenses but would like to have a more dedicated setup such as the Canon 180 mm f/3.5 macro with my 1.4 TC and perhaps a set of extension tubes! This was my original thought-!! but having looked around for some time in many forums and reading countless revues on the subject I am left sumewhat confused on the lens issue and this is what I am left with.

Canon 180 mm 3.5 macro:-
To heavy, Old technology, to long and newer lenses are equal if not better in sharpness, Expensive.
Tamron 180 mm 3.5 SP Di macro:-
Poorly built plastic body, not as good in sharpness as others, clunky operation, lens foot is fragile, lens extends externally.
Sigma 180 mm 3.5 EX macro:-
Not as good as the Canon, Soft.
On the other hand if I was to go with the Canon 100 mm 2.5 macro that most consider to be a great lens but to short for flighty objects such as insects.
At this moment in time I am looking into the mid range macro:-
Sigma 150 mm 2,8 EX macro:-
Better sharpness than its 180 brother and as good if not better than the Canon 180,Not to heavy, Solid build, Fast and has added bonus of being a good portrait lens.
It sounds like I answer my own questions but this is just things I have picked up from here and there and not a collected debate of the pros and cons of these lenses by real people that have used a number of macros or perhaps have years of experience in macro photography,
Its for this reason I am making this post and would like to here your opinions on my observations, as I say I am new to macro and a hand up would be very much appreciated.
Just to say I have seen fantastic shots from all the above lenses on pbase and others with the exception of the Canon 180 mm but then the price of this lens may be a factor in that there are less people with the lens.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-12-05, 19:20
birder birder is offline  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: London
Posts: 3
Default

Hi Marshall

Not sure what your main subjects with your macro photography are going to be. Insects in flight sounds (and is!) tricky. My experience (with a Nikon 801 35 mm camera initially, and now with a Nikon D100) has been with the Tamron SP 90 (1:1 life size - a superb lens in my opinion), and more recently the Nikon 105 (I know not compatible with your set up).

The Tamron is excellent for flowers, fungi, insects, as well as being a great portrait lens. I've had mine for nearly 15 years and still marvel at it. Excellent value for money. Not sure if you can still buy it in manual form though (mine is).

The extra 'reach' of a lens, say 180mm, can be helpful and extend the distance between you and the subject, but even with insects, a quiet approach with a 90mm Tamron brought very satisfying results. Not sure if a 180mm would be like for eg flower photography.

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-12-05, 09:20
ruchai ruchai is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sriracha,Thailand
Posts: 38
Default

"Insects in flight sounds (and is!) tricky." Yes and no. For flying dragonflies it is possible with auto focus tele. This one was taken with Nikon D50 and Nikkor 80-400VR.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dragonfly_2_DSC_1352.jpg (56.8 KB, 118 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-12-05, 07:38
pxl8 pxl8 is offline  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somerset
Age: 55
Posts: 13
Default

For flight shots of insects I've had good success with the Sigma 70-300 DG macro lens at 300mm with a working distance of around 3-4 feet. A good working distance helps a lot with flying insects, get too close and you have to move around a lot more.

The trick is to watch your subject's behaviour and stay calm. Pre-focus manually and wait for the subject to come into frame, fine tune and shoot. I found that manually focussing between leaves on a bush was a good way to improve my speed and "learn" the lens until it became second nature.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 27-08-05-07.jpg (89.1 KB, 99 views)
File Type: jpg 27-08-05-06.jpg (91.3 KB, 68 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-07-06, 21:07
Stuart R Stuart R is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Balerno, Midlothian
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall
First things first, I am a new member and look forward to learning new things and contributing when my limited experience will allow, so can I just say Halo to you all and Merry Christmas - All the best for the new year to all.

I found this thread indeed this site whiles looking for a macro lens and learn something of the techniques used to obtain good results,
I know the attributes of the 500D and indeed have experimented with this on a number of lenses but would like to have a more dedicated setup such as the Canon 180 mm f/3.5 macro with my 1.4 TC and perhaps a set of extension tubes! This was my original thought-!! but having looked around for some time in many forums and reading countless revues on the subject I am left sumewhat confused on the lens issue and this is what I am left with.

Canon 180 mm 3.5 macro:-
To heavy, Old technology, to long and newer lenses are equal if not better in sharpness, Expensive.
Tamron 180 mm 3.5 SP Di macro:-
Poorly built plastic body, not as good in sharpness as others, clunky operation, lens foot is fragile, lens extends externally.
Sigma 180 mm 3.5 EX macro:-
Not as good as the Canon, Soft.
On the other hand if I was to go with the Canon 100 mm 2.5 macro that most consider to be a great lens but to short for flighty objects such as insects.
At this moment in time I am looking into the mid range macro:-
Sigma 150 mm 2,8 EX macro:-
Better sharpness than its 180 brother and as good if not better than the Canon 180,Not to heavy, Solid build, Fast and has added bonus of being a good portrait lens.
It sounds like I answer my own questions but this is just things I have picked up from here and there and not a collected debate of the pros and cons of these lenses by real people that have used a number of macros or perhaps have years of experience in macro photography,
Its for this reason I am making this post and would like to here your opinions on my observations, as I say I am new to macro and a hand up would be very much appreciated.
Just to say I have seen fantastic shots from all the above lenses on pbase and others with the exception of the Canon 180 mm but then the price of this lens may be a factor in that there are less people with the lens.

Hi

Just joined this forum and have just posted some images using my D70 and my brand new Sigma 150 - appears to be a cracking lens and the working distance is great. Fact that it is internal focus is also very useful and I am impressed with the results I have been getting so far. Check out those I have posted. Don't think you would be disappointed if you bought this lens.

Cheers

Stuart R.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-07-06, 21:30
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

I think:
Canon 100 f2.8 best optically.
Tamron 90 and Sigma 105 about on a par with each other and not that much behind the Canon but cheaper.
The "crop factor" makes a 160 out of the Canon and roughly the same for the others so focal length should be fine. If you want more length then Kenko 1.4 converter (I have the Pro version which is excellent) or Tamron 1.4 would do the trick nicelly and maintain auto focus. Hope that helps. Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-08-06, 18:22
gordon g gordon g is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,766
Default

I have just joined this forum too, so no images posted yet. I have used 2 macro lenses - sigma 105 2.8EX and tamrom 180 2.8. The sigma was excellent, good build quality, pleasing bokeh, but had the drawback of very short working distances especially for 1:1. I found it hard to get close to insects, and sometimes would obstruct the light whilst trying to work the camera. The tamron doesnt feel as solid, true, but it it is still well constructed. The greater working length is its biggest advantage (about 30cm for 1:1), and it is quite light for its size. I have tended to use both lenses on MF for macro work, but I do find the tamron AF quicker when I use it. Both do well as portrait lenses.

Althouhg I would find it hard to choose one or the other for image quality,I use the tamron more than the sigma now, which I think speaks for its ease of use.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-08-06, 19:31
Leif Leif is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luton
Posts: 911
Default

I think one or two of you might be surprised by these results:

http://www.nnplus.de/macro/Macro100E.html

The Tamron 90mm is very highly thought of with one at least one well known pro describing it as one of the all time great macro lenses. The Tamron 180, Sigma 180 and Canon 180 macros were tested by AP magazine, and the results were akin to those in the link above.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-08-06, 02:03
nirofo's Avatar
nirofo nirofo is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Scotland
Posts: 798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif
I think one or two of you might be surprised by these results:

http://www.nnplus.de/macro/Macro100E.html

The Tamron 90mm is very highly thought of with one at least one well known pro describing it as one of the all time great macro lenses. The Tamron 180, Sigma 180 and Canon 180 macros were tested by AP magazine, and the results were akin to those in the link above.

I've used a Tamron 90mm Macro for years, I started with the manual focus Adaptall 2 version and finished up with the latest AF version, which I am still using. I can vouch for it's quality of reproduction and would recommend it without hesitation. I've also used the latest one with an old Nikon 1.6 AF converter with outstanding results. I tried the Nikon 105mm Macro for a while, but I couldn't get on with it, so I traded it in for the Tamron 90mm AF Macro and a Unilok tripod with head.

nirofo

Last edited by nirofo; 15-08-06 at 02:05.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-08-06, 19:49
miketoll's Avatar
miketoll miketoll is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 7,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leif
I think one or two of you might be surprised by these results:

http://www.nnplus.de/macro/Macro100E.html

The Tamron 90mm is very highly thought of with one at least one well known pro describing it as one of the all time great macro lenses. The Tamron 180, Sigma 180 and Canon 180 macros were tested by AP magazine, and the results were akin to those in the link above.
Yes, I am surprised by these results as they disagree with every other review I've seen over the years which put the Canon first followed by Tamron and Sigma sometimes one, sometimes the other second. Ah well, that's reviews and possible variations in individual lenses for you! The bottom line is they are all good so it comes down to price and what feels right in the hand to the buyer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.