![]() |
Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
General Photography Technique Discussion on General Photography Technique |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#131
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Very good postie,
I have just been looking at the composite on BF. Don |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Dave |
#133
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sassan,
I understand your set up, but what shutter speed were you using? The surface of the moon would have mooved past quickly in your view finder; this must have been your bigest challange or did you have a tracking device as used on some telescopes? |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
No Jonathan I didn't use any tracking device. As you mentioned the moon does move extremely quick at this magnification. To give you an estimate, for every 4 fast shots I take, a repositioning is a must (Moon has moved out of view finder). The effective diaphragm, considering I started with wide open 600mm's of F/4.5 would be 1/3 higher for FD to EOS adapter, 2x2x3 for the 3 extenders, and 1.6 for digital factor, so something like 27 lower F which is translated to something like F/107. ____________________________________________ How I reach to this F number? Well Fstop = Focal length / maximum diameter of lens so my magnification is: (600 + 33%) x 1.6 x 2 x 2 x 3 or 14285mm lens Now apply formula: F = 14285mm / 133mm F = 107 ____________________________________________ My main secrete or rather luck is the good sensor of Canon that can take a reasonable (Within the limitations) picture at ISO 1600. If you check the EXIF, I had ISO 1600 for 1/15 seconds. This is at F/67 (If my calculation is right). I have tried lower shutter speed even close to 1 second with various degree of success to not show motion artifact. Also I tried one or two F stop lower from lens but not much to speak about. Well all I can say is I am personally impressed and had a fun in this trial. By the way now that we got to this discussion, let me just talk little like Archimedes: "Give me a level point and with adding few more billions extender, I may let you walk to the moon literary with my tele tube..." ![]() Ahhh not felt good like this in a long time. Well truly speaking after learning about the problems builder had to erect the London's Eye in the side of Thames river, I really start to appreciate Archimedes' wisdom even more... ![]()
__________________
S a s s a n . ------------------------------ "No one is going to take our democracy away from us. Not now, not ever. " JOE BIDEN Last edited by sassan; 10-03-07 at 06:44. |
#135
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find the best exposure for the moon is ISO 200, f/5.6, 1/125. Bracket exposures and keep the equipment rock steady.
To get good detail of craters, do not take a full moon as there ae no cast shadows. Use the longest focal length you have. See attachment Best regards to all Last edited by Jonathan Farmer; 16-03-07 at 14:47. Reason: Chang Image |
#136
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That really is a wonderful shot Jonathan,the shadows really add 3d to it. Your settings are very helpful,I did`nt realize how bright the moon actually is.
Here`s my feeble attempt; |
#137
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is a shot of the moon from the night before last that shows a fair amount of surface detail.
400mm AIS lens 1/80 sec at f8 ISO200 A bit of a heavy crop but my shot with the 2 x converter is too soft. ![]() Don |
#138
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sassan,
I managed to pick up a used DG-2 eyepiece magnifier but now have to wait for the eyepiece adaptor to arrive. Now I just need to find a decent 1.4 converter that will work with my 400mm f5.6 AIS lens. A look at Andys lens comparison suggests I need an old 500mm to go with it on the basis that a 500 is a lot more portable than a 600. ![]() Don |
#139
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi guys,
You have to look at this site!!!!! Its the best I have seen of the moon using camera lenses as compared to telescopes; these moon shots were taken stacking TC converters one on top another using a Sigma 300-800 f/5.6 lens. Romy is a very good and interesting photographer and I think a lot can be learnt from him........ http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/moon_shots Regards Jonathan |
#140
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
WOW
Thanks for that Jonathan. The first few I have looked at are amazing. Now bookmarked. Don |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|