![]() |
Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
Lenses Discussion of Lenses |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
what brand of camera are you using? I'm only asking as the Sigma 150-500 retails for ~£700 which if you're a Canon user would but you in the region of a used 100-400 IS or 400 f5.6 both of which will out perform the Sigma or the Tamron. Sure you won't have as much reach but a good quality 400mm will be better than a lesser 500mm.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37669825@N04/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Im currently using a sony a200 so if you have got any other suggestions i would be glad to hear them.
Thanks Andrew |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I have been using the Tamron 200-500 for about 3 years now and can say without hesitation the quality of results is consistantly excellent. I also have a Nikon 500 f4 AFS which is second to none for image quality, what I can say without hesitation is the Tamron at 1/8 the price of the Nikon gives me results that I am hard pressed to distinguish between at times. Where there is no comparison is at the extremes of use, I can use the Nikon wide open and still achieve fantastic results, the Tamron I use stopped down to f8 to achieve more than excellent results, (at the 500mm end of course). This obviously means I need more available light or have to up the ISO rating to achieva a useable speed setting at f8. If I was working on a limited budget, or needed a lens which would give me more mobility when travelling then the Tamron is the way to go, it works well hand held for flight shots etc, (did I mention that I use it mainly for wildlife). It's lighter than the Sigma and according to many including myself, gives better results and that's what counts. Here's a couple of shots from the Tamron. nirofo. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Don't think that the Tamron has been put up against the new 150-500 in any reviews, don't get confused with the old Sigma 170-500 that I had. Not doubting the Tamron is a super lens but unless any one has used both in the same conditions then an individual can not really comment on which is better. This is quite interesting http://www.juzaphoto.com/eng/article...500_50-500.htm
and this is always a useful site http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/ Hope they help. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike
Yeah that was an interesting artical. Thanks Andrew |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|