![]() |
Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
![]() | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
The Photography Forum General Photography Related Discussion. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My little Canon Ixus 700 has a focal length stated to be 7.7 - 23mm - seems pretty wide. Yet in practise I get more in shot with my 18-55 Nikon kit lens. Any thoughts/advice folks? Forgive me if it's a stupid question.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Canon Ixus 700 has an equivalent focal length of 37mm to 111mm.
It is all to do with the very small sensor in the Ixus compared to your DSLR sensor size. The crop factor for the Ixus is 4.8 were as the Nikon will be 1.5. You multiply the the real lens focal length by the crop factor to get the equivalent 35mm camera focal lenght.
__________________
Rob ----------------------------------------------------- Solar powered Box Brownie Mk2 Captain Sunshine, to be such a man as he, and walk so pure between the earth and the sea. WPF Gallery Birdforum Gallery |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peter, it is probably due to the Canon's small sensor and its crop factor, which could be in the range of 5 to six times those stated above. This would give a focal length of 35 - 45 mm. I can understand crop factor, but I'll be blowed if I can explain it in simple terms (or even complicated terms). I'm sure that there are web sites that can explain it with diagrams.
Rob posted his reply whilst I was writing mine - good explanation, Rob. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you both. I'm enlightened. I thought the Canon should be a good bet for this month's challenge but now I'm beginning to understand why it wont.
![]()
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
16mm is the best 1200 canon brand if not 10-20mm cheap $500.00 sigma
I do most of my landscape with a wide |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter I think Robski birdsnapper are right.Full Sensor (FF) 1:1 as 35mm used to be, cropped on DSLR 1.5 or 1.6 X the focal length on small sensor the factor is much larger giving a multiplying factor of more than 3 they used to mark Focal Length equiv to 35mm so this misunderstanding whould not happen but more recently with some manufacturers they give actual mm . I hope thats not to long winded.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Paul. That's a useful explanation.
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This link might help, as long as you can dig through the waffle - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37669825@N04/ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks, I did look - but maybe I'll save that for a winter's day.
![]()
__________________
One Photograph is worth a Thousand Words |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|