WPF - World Photography Forum
Home Gallery Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Welcome to World Photography Forum!
Welcome!

Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Click here to join.


Go Back   World Photography Forum > Photography Technique > General Photography Technique


General Photography Technique Discussion on General Photography Technique

Photographing the Moon

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #131  
Old 04-03-07, 16:13
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Thumbs up

Very good postie,

I have just been looking at the composite on BF.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 04-03-07, 16:13
Dave Smith's Avatar
Dave Smith Dave Smith is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maldon, Essex
Age: 83
Posts: 576
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by postcardcv View Post
superb to watch the eclipse on a clear night... here's my best shot of the red moon and a sequence of it going into shadow.

Taken with my 400D and Sigma 500 f4.5 on top of Manfrotto 055 legs and 501 head.
Very nice and well presented.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 10-03-07, 00:17
Jonathan Farmer Jonathan Farmer is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Barbados
Posts: 874
Default

Sassan,

I understand your set up, but what shutter speed were you using? The surface of the moon would have mooved past quickly in your view finder; this must have been your bigest challange or did you have a tracking device as used on some telescopes?
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 10-03-07, 06:38
sassan's Avatar
sassan sassan is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 16,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Farmer View Post
Sassan,

I understand your set up, but what shutter speed were you using? The surface of the moon would have mooved past quickly in your view finder; this must have been your bigest challange or did you have a tracking device as used on some telescopes?

No Jonathan I didn't use any tracking device. As you mentioned the moon does move extremely quick at this magnification. To give you an estimate, for every 4 fast shots I take, a repositioning is a must (Moon has moved out of view finder).
The effective diaphragm, considering I started with wide open 600mm's of F/4.5 would be 1/3 higher for FD to EOS adapter, 2x2x3 for the 3 extenders, and 1.6 for digital factor, so something like 27 lower F which is translated to something like F/107.
____________________________________________
How I reach to this F number? Well
Fstop = Focal length / maximum diameter of lens
so my magnification is:
(600 + 33%) x 1.6 x 2 x 2 x 3
or
14285mm lens
Now apply formula:
F = 14285mm / 133mm
F = 107
____________________________________________

My main secrete or rather luck is the good sensor of Canon that can take a reasonable (Within the limitations) picture at ISO 1600.

If you check the EXIF, I had ISO 1600 for 1/15 seconds. This is at F/67 (If my calculation is right). I have tried lower shutter speed even close to 1 second with various degree of success to not show motion artifact. Also I tried one or two F stop lower from lens but not much to speak about. Well all I can say is I am personally impressed and had a fun in this trial. By the way now that we got to this discussion, let me just talk little like Archimedes:
"Give me a level point and with adding few more billions extender, I may let you walk to the moon literary with my tele tube..."
Ahhh not felt good like this in a long time.
Well truly speaking after learning about the problems builder had to erect the London's Eye in the side of Thames river, I really start to appreciate Archimedes' wisdom even more...
__________________
S a s s a n .

------------------------------

"No one is going to take our democracy away from us. Not now, not ever.
" JOE BIDEN

Last edited by sassan; 10-03-07 at 06:44.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 16-03-07, 14:36
Jonathan Farmer Jonathan Farmer is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Barbados
Posts: 874
Default Exposing the moon

I find the best exposure for the moon is ISO 200, f/5.6, 1/125. Bracket exposures and keep the equipment rock steady.

To get good detail of craters, do not take a full moon as there ae no cast shadows. Use the longest focal length you have.

See attachment

Best regards to all
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Moon.jpg (38.4 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by Jonathan Farmer; 16-03-07 at 14:47. Reason: Chang Image
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 16-03-07, 20:16
somert8 somert8 is offline  
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wiggin,England
Posts: 44
Default

That really is a wonderful shot Jonathan,the shadows really add 3d to it. Your settings are very helpful,I did`nt realize how bright the moon actually is.

Here`s my feeble attempt;
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_10652.jpg (112.3 KB, 14 views)
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 24-04-07, 13:52
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Here is a shot of the moon from the night before last that shows a fair amount of surface detail.

400mm AIS lens 1/80 sec at f8 ISO200

A bit of a heavy crop but my shot with the 2 x converter is too soft.

Don
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Moon 22 april.jpg (147.2 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 24-04-07, 15:00
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Default

Sassan,

I managed to pick up a used DG-2 eyepiece magnifier but now have to wait for the eyepiece adaptor to arrive.
Now I just need to find a decent 1.4 converter that will work with my 400mm f5.6 AIS lens. A look at Andys lens comparison suggests I need an old 500mm to go with it on the basis that a 500 is a lot more portable than a 600.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 24-04-07, 15:23
Jonathan Farmer Jonathan Farmer is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Barbados
Posts: 874
Default

Hi guys,

You have to look at this site!!!!! Its the best I have seen of the moon using camera lenses as compared to telescopes; these moon shots were taken stacking TC converters one on top another using a Sigma 300-800 f/5.6 lens. Romy is a very good and interesting photographer and I think a lot can be learnt from him........ http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/moon_shots

Regards

Jonathan
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 24-04-07, 17:06
Don Hoey's Avatar
Don Hoey Don Hoey is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 4,462
Thumbs up

WOW

Thanks for that Jonathan. The first few I have looked at are amazing. Now bookmarked.

Don
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.