|
|
| Welcome to World Photography Forum! | |
 | Thank you for finding your way to World Photography Forum, a dedicated community for photographers and enthusiasts. There's a variety of forums, a wonderful gallery, and what's more, we are absolutely FREE. You are very welcome to join, take part in the discussion, and post your pictures!
|
|
|||||||
| Lenses Discussion of Lenses |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
29-09-08, 23:04
|
||||
|
||||
caught between two lens :/
Ive been looking to replace or say upgrade my sigma 70-300apo to one with IS, the 2 lenses i've looked at are the canon 55-250is and the latest canon 70-300is i was wondering if anybody had any experience with these lenses and if theres really any benifit with paying the extra 100 poundsfor the 70-300
|
|
#2
30-09-08, 04:19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have no experience with either but don't know why if I was to pick up one, it surly would be 55-250.
__________________
S a s s a n . ------------------------------ "No one is going to take our democracy away from us. Not now, not ever. " JOE BIDEN
|
|
#3
30-09-08, 05:31
|
||||
|
||||
|
'Photozone' does quite good lens reviews and might be of help.
|
|
#4
30-09-08, 07:19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't seen any reviews of the 55-250 Is, but I have the 70-300 IS and it really is an excellent lens. Reviews suggest that image quality is almost on a par with L series lenses
|
|
#5
30-09-08, 14:41
|
||||
|
||||
|
No experience of either lens but the question I would have is if you went for the 55-250 would you miss the extra reach or does the wider end of the lens appeal to you? I would prefer the extra reach and the wider end can be covered by another lens like the standard zoom you probably have.
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
